User talk:Neobridge
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Neobridge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Jay Chou did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. shoy (reactions) 13:19, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- I reverted your edits because you didn't provide a source. China-Taiwan relations are contentious on Wikipedia just like they are in real life, and new editors that jump into contentious areas are often looked on with suspicion because they frequently want to push a certain point of view. Wikipedia writes in a neutral point of view based on reliable sources. If you would like to make these changes, please gain consensus on the article's talk page. shoy (reactions) 13:23, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
[edit]
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. shoy (reactions) 13:33, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Neobridge, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Neobridge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019
[edit]Re your edits on the article of Jay Chou, please do note that Wikipedia does not take a stand on the political status of Taiwan and editors usually use whatever that is the most familiar or used by English speakers. For example, articles on people from Hong Kong and Puerto Rico do not use the adjective “Chinese” or “American” despite there is no disagreement on their political status as a subnational entities. Please refrain from further editing this subject or you could risk being blocked from editing.