User talk:Neo Poz

Welcome!

Hello, Neo Poz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 23:53, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neo Poz, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Neo Poz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Macroeconomics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Profit

Sociology of the Internet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Consolidation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why remove it? I, for one, welcome our disambiguating bot overlords. Neo Poz (talk) 01:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Health care articles

Welcome aboard! I had proposed a merge of the HR676 article into the single payer article over the weekend, I'd love your input one way or the other if you're so inclined. Thanks! Thargor Orlando (talk) 12:50, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied here. Neo Poz (talk) 01:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

glyphosate

thanks for your note and invitation to discuss! lovely and rare.Jytdog (talk) 11:53, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Single-payer polls

Hey a while back Thargor Orlando and North8000 have been removing polls in the single-payer article and replacing it with NPOV language. If could undue their latest revert it would be appreciated, we've tried to remedy the problem through every avenue available but to avail. Thanks. --CartoonDiablo (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied: not until the RFC closes, but shared it with a few wikiprojects. Neo Poz (talk) 06:31, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it tomorrow but in the meantime can you give your opinion that they are in fact single-payer polls and that we need the chart in the talk page? Thanks. CartoonDiablo (talk) 04:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I weighed in on the talk page, but no way am I getting involved in that article's edit war. Maybe I will think of some way to abbreviate the information in the table when I get bored of hitting myself in the head with my laptop. Neo Poz (talk) 05:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me after several months I know, its irritating but so far as I can tell the only way now (given that literally all other dispute resolution methods have been thrown away) is to edit for the consensus. Maybe not right away but we'll need your help with any reverts, ANI etc. in the short term. Once its been taken care of, and that's probably soon, then it'll be settled.

Edits to the table are definitely welcome, I was thinking of making it collapsible given the sheer number of polls. CartoonDiablo (talk) 03:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While I'm sure you didn't intend it, you understand that this looks like canvassing, right CD? Thargor Orlando (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He wasn't involved with the single-payer article from what I can tell, and I previously asked like 5 other uninvolved editors (I think two of which were admins) so apologizes if this would might be seen as too close. CartoonDiablo (talk) 05:50, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joe's Null Bot 2 BRFA request filed.

FYI, --j⚛e decker ^talk 08:15, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CartoonDiablo (talk) 03:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Neo Poz; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silent Circle (software)

Hello Neo Poz,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Silent Circle (software) for deletion, because it seems to be an promotion, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Krushia (talk) 06:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]