User talk:Neo Adamik
| This is Neo Adamik's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Creating new articles
[edit]Hello, I have noticed you created many drafts as your first actions after creating a Wikipedia account. While I appreciate these contributions, I think your time is better spent improving existing articles, as that will help you get a feel for skills necessary to create new ones, such as notability, inline citations, synthesis and original research, etc. One good way to start is at your newcomer homepage. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 18:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh okay! Thank you for the suggestion. Outside of the newer ecomomic draft, I will focus on editing existing Wikipedia articles. Neo Adamik (talk) 19:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Do you believe I should stop my efforts with the 1960’s economic draft? If that’s the case I can comply with that also. Neo Adamik (talk) 19:14, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you can prove that the topic is notable then definitely. Statistics from the US government don't satisfy the 'significant coverage' part, as they don't speak about the 1960s boom. In fact, without a source specifically naming the boom, the whole draft would qualify as original synthesis of published material. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 19:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oh okay got it! Thank you, I understand. I will take your advice and focus on editing. Neo Adamik (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- I created a draft for the Perry school shooting, but that was denied because you doubted that the shooting would have a lasting impact. But now, there is an article for it. I’m not necessarily complaining, I am just confused on how the system works. Was the other person able to prove it will have a lasting impact? Neo Adamik (talk) 00:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- If you can prove that the topic is notable then definitely. Statistics from the US government don't satisfy the 'significant coverage' part, as they don't speak about the 1960s boom. In fact, without a source specifically naming the boom, the whole draft would qualify as original synthesis of published material. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 19:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Perry Iowa January Fourth Shooting
[edit]
Hello, Neo Adamik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Perry Iowa January Fourth Shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:1960's United States boom
[edit] Hello, Neo Adamik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1960's United States boom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:1960's United States boom
[edit]
Hello, Neo Adamik. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "1960's United States boom".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)