User talk:Nenoniel

Welcome!

Hello, Nenoniel, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Riistavesi (former municipality), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Riistavesi (former municipality)

The article Riistavesi (former municipality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and quite not notable former municipality

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 20:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, I'm My Pants Metal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Conan O'Brien have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. My Pants Metal (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iisalmen maalaiskunta

Please stop creating unreferenced articles; the WP:BURDEN is on the creator to verify their information. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 05:52, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riistavesi (former municipality) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riistavesi (former municipality) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riistavesi (former municipality) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Iisalmen maalaiskunta

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Nenoniel, thanks for creating Iisalmen maalaiskunta!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 12:23, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hilja Jorma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hilja Jorma, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Richard Pervo, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Muzilon (talk) 00:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are a pervo, if you think that Pervo's surname wasn't very suitable! Nenoniel (talk) 00:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Pervo. Chetsford (talk) 00:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User_Nenoniel. Muzilon (talk) 00:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Jorma (name). Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Beauty School Dropout (talk) 05:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for editing while logged out. Note this allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 06:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]