User talk:Nemboysha

2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine

Hello! You recently placed a POV boilerplate at the top of the page 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine. Please be aware that boilerplates are not a substitute for discussion, and will be removed unless their insertion is justified on the talk page of the article, so that the potential issues may be addressed. If you genuinely believe there is a POV concern, please describe it on the talk page so that it can be dissolved. Otherwise, it it will be removed. Thank you, RGloucester — ☎ 16:36, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Template:Administrative divisions of Ukraine does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Insane and offensive allegation

Re [1]. In that edit summary you seem to accuse me of "Holocaust denial". That is completely ridiculous and absurd. Perhaps you have not bothered to actually look at the edit in question or the talk page discussion. Please refrain from making such slanderous accusations in the future.

While I'm here, can I inquire how you came to edit that article? It seems your interest here on Wikipedia concern the ongoing Ukrainian-Russian crisis, rather than WW2 in Greece.Volunteer Marek (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to lend some support here. Referring to that edit as holocaust denial is hugely offensive. It isn't like user Volunteer Marek is removing the Nazi war crimes category or any content relating to the holocaust from the article. I would strongly encourage you to apologise --Drowninginlimbo (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It may be because the events at Kalavryta are called a "holocaust" in Greece. [2].--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 17:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions of Ukraine... again!

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Template:Administrative divisions of Ukraine, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.
If you wish to change the template to read, "Corresponding territory administered by Russia as the Republic of Crimea and the Federal City of Sevastopol" rather than the previous, "claimed by Russia...", please engage in the WP:BRD process. It is not a BRR process. Iryna Harpy (talk) 06:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at State-sponsored terrorism ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:09, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at State-sponsored terrorism. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres (read as a single purpose account specifically dedicated to a political theme), as you did to Template:Administrative divisions of Ukraine, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive.
I have already asked that you engage in a discussion per WP:BRD. It is notable that you have had a number of requests to desist from flouting Wikipedia policy and guidelines, yet you persist in active editing while failing to provide edit summaries or engage in discussion with other editors/contributors. I interpret this as treating Wikipedia as a WP:BATTLEGROUND, and am asking that you respond to me directly ASAP. Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Treaty of Lausanne. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative divisions of Ukraine template edit war

Hi, you are invited to resolve your dispute with Iryna Harpy on the template's talk page. Feon {^t/_c} 14:15, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Template:States with limited recognition. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:04, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]