User talk:Neilharrap

Welcome!

Hello, Neilharrap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Neil Harrap, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neil Harrap

The article Neil Harrap has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Neil Harrap has been reverted.
Your edit here to Neil Harrap was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21K6n-HMXQs) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that you meet the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, or they will be deleted. The types of links removed automatically by the bot are not adequate and do not conform with our policies, as explained in the bot edit above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that all the text needs to be referenced or it may be removed. Use <ref>[url description]</ref> for in-line citations, and put {{reflist}} at the end to generate the list Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:58, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Neil Harrap (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neil Harrap.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Neilharrap, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Draft:Neil Harrap concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Neil Harrap, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Neil Harrap

Hello Neilharrap. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Neil Harrap".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Neil Harrap}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lor^Talk 04:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Notability (people)

The "Karl Du Fresne" content seemed to be the draft of a possible article?... In any case you put it in the wrong place on Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Notability (people) is an instructional page, concerning the parameters that indicate if a person is even notable enough to have a Wikipedia article & how to prove that notability. I would suggest you use your sandbox - ^^^see it, right up there at the right-top of the page? - to develop and work on possible article-content. Shearonink (talk) 05:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neil Harrap for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil Harrap is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Harrap until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Neilharrap: The lesson here is, if you have a questionable edit history the last thing you should do is draw attention to your editing. I didn't know you were promotional editor before but now I can properly address this with you. Thanks. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:28, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karl du Fresne

The article Karl du Fresne has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mattlore (talk) 04:43, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]