User talk:Neha Sharma7

Neha Sharma7, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Neha Sharma7! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anusree has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anusree was changed by Neha Sharma7 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851534 on 2020-12-31T06:01:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Danielle Delaunay

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Danielle Delaunay, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://thestickyfacts.com/danielle-delaunay-facts/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Danielle Delaunay and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Danielle Delaunay, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Danielle Delaunay. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Danielle Delaunay with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Danielle Delaunay saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 04:39, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Delaunay tagged for deletion

Hello Neha Sharma7, I wanted to let you know that I've tagged Danielle Delaunay for deletion because its text appears to be copied from a copyrighted source. There are very few cases where one can directly copy text into Wikipedia. – Thjarkur (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rahee Vasant Dahake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahee Vasant Dahake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahee Vasant Dahake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

VV 12:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of WP:BLP. I have emailed WP:ARBCOM for review. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Johnuniq (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Neha Sharma7, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

—twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 04:43, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]