User talk:Negingxiilch78

Negingxiilch78, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Negingxiilch78! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saneie Masilela

Hello Negingxiilch78,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Saneie Masilela for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains (talk) 17:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanele Masilela

Hello Negingxiilch78,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sanele Masilela for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meatsgains (talk) 18:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saneie Masilela

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saneie Masilela requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saneie Masilela for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saneie Masilela is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saneie Masilela until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meatsgains (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Vasectomees has been nominated for discussion

Category:Vasectomees, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 19:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Benito Alessi. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spray-on garment listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spray-on garment. Since you had some involvement with the Spray-on garment redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spray-on dress listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spray-on dress. Since you had some involvement with the Spray-on dress redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spray-on outfit listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spray-on outfit. Since you had some involvement with the Spray-on outfit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spray-on clothes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spray-on clothes. Since you had some involvement with the Spray-on clothes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pseudophobias has been nominated for discussion

Category:Pseudophobias, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 18:22, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Telegraph

Not really a reliable source for anything. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Unfair fight

Hello, Negingxiilch78,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Unfair fight should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unfair fight .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Joe Roe (talk) 21:01, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disability and religion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disability and religion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disability and religion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RoCo^(talk) 06:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lingam massage

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lingam massage, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiLinuz🍁(talk) 13:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]