User talk:Neffateriet/sandbox

Thank You All for Your Feedback

Neffateriet

Name of student reviewer: Alyssa Bhagwandin

Date of review: 5/15/2013

Name of editor Wikipedia User: Wikipedia User: Neffateriet

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/15/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/15/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length was good

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): information from the text was accurate

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes it is adherent to I/O Psychology

Wikiformatting: good formatting

Grammar & composition: grammar and composition was good

Other comments: good job!

User:A_Bhagwandin (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/13/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good Grammar. Just make sure you don't need an "s" after "student" and "reason" in the first line.
Other comments	Edit looks good! Review is for References and Letters of Rec.

Joselv83 (talk) 15:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good Grammar.
Other comments	Everything looks great!

Joselv83 (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User: Keronica Grant
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	n/a
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	Primary
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	good job! --Keronica Grant (talk) 04:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Aman11040
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	none needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Format
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	A good edit overall

Aman11040 (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Aman11040
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	none needed for this article
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurately stated
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Format overall
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	A good edit and it was needed for this article

Aman11040 (talk) 02:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Azahur
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	none picture needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Format
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	A good edit overall, also I liked the information

Azahur (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Azahur
Date of review	5/8/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/8/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/8/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	none picture needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Format
Grammar & composition	Good grammar
Other comments	this edit is for References And Letter of Recommendation

Azahur (talk) 04:47, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:VIMMYSEAJATAN
Date of review	5/13/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: :Neffateriet
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/13/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/13/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	good length
Image (needed/appropriate)	none picture needed
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	the information was accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Format
Grammar & composition	Good
Other comments	good Vimmy (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC) Pre edit peer review Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User: Joan Bailey Date of review 5/15/2013 Name of editor Wikipedia User: Neffateriet URL of editor’s Userpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Neffateriet/sandbox Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/15/13 Date review submitted to instructor 05/15/13 Length of edit (too long/too short) The length of the edit is Good. Image (needed/appropriate) N/A Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Textbook information is accurately edited. Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) The information presented relates to I/O Psych Wikiformatting Formatting is good. Grammar & composition Grammar and composition is good. Other comments Nice job Joan Bailey (talk) 19:22, 15 May 2013 (UTC)