User talk:Nedryun

September 2018

Hello, I'm Jtrrs0. I noticed that you recently removed content from Trish Regan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not mark as minor an edit that is not minor. Jtrrs0 (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, Nedryun. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Jtrrs0 (talk) 21:30, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Your recent editing history at Trish Regan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. O3000 (talk) 21:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trish Regan

Hello,

I invite you to participate in the discussion to improve Trish Regan's article here. Hope to see you there! Jtrrs0 (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the New York Times quote and citation removed? And Ms. Regan never directly equated Denmark with Venezuela. To include such a statement is false.

I responded in the talk page. Jtrrs0 (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a talk page. Just curious to know why you removed New York Times quote and citation? Also, another question: why on Wikipedia does it allow the search for Trish Regan to come up with Fake News Anchor? More appropriate is American News TV personality or political commentator. Doesn't appear terribly evenhanded. Nedryun (talk) 00:15, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nedryun, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nedryun! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 September 2018 (UTC)