User talk:Neddyseagoon/2008/February

Reward for all your translations

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Truly impressed by the amount of articles from other Wiki's initiated in the English project by you. This one was simply waiting for you. Well deserved. Arnoutf (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:LatinalphabetV

Template:LatinalphabetV has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Anomie ⚔ 03:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Eurostar WI

A tag has been placed on Template:Eurostar WI requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External map service links

Hello. You have been identified as having added or removed direct external map service links in articles[1]. There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:External links#Issues with inclusion or exclusion of map service links about which should be done, and some more opinions would be good to find community consensus. --Para (talk) 23:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Maritime Gendarmerie

A tag has been placed on Template:Maritime Gendarmerie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Olimpia Aldobrandini

I found her dates with Google, at the Italian site linked in the article[2]. You'll probably find her family members' dates there, too. Cheers, Yamara ✉ 13:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. Neddyseagoon - talk 13:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stowage

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Stowage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Gendarmerie Nat left

A tag has been placed on Template:Gendarmerie Nat left requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

coordinator election

The Wikiproject History is going to elect 3 coordinators. As a member you are invited to participate. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:16, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Margaret Lindsay (1726 - 1782)

An editor has nominated Margaret Lindsay (1726 - 1782), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Lindsay (1726 - 1782) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Memoirs of Hadrian (film)

An editor has nominated Memoirs of Hadrian (film), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Memoirs of Hadrian (film) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ReineElizabeth.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:ReineElizabeth.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:LeatherMariebellgarconne.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:LeatherMariebellgarconne.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User uk wikipedian small

A tag has been placed on Template:User uk wikipedian small requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:59, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

while looking for references

I notice you had copied from ODNB the 2nd half of the article now at AfD. Please rewrite it immediately. And please double check your other articles. DGG (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Birley family

Hi - I have somewhat changed the template that you created a year ago to include all (I think) the members of the wider family who have (or merit) articles on WP. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 10:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Académie royale de Danse

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Académie royale de Danse, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Académie royale de Danse is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Académie royale de Danse, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amazed!

Really. I am amazed by your ability to write so many interesting articles on such a wide variety of subjects. Every time I go and look on the new pages, there you are with Italian palaces, French theatre companies, Dutch artists, you name it. Incredible stuff. I don't know how you do it, but please do keep doing it. Very best wishes, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Westmoreland/Westmorland

That's an interesting one. According to Colledge, no ship of either name has ever served with the Navy. I note that it says she was at least temporarily a privateer, so the truth is that she was probably converted from civilian service and never formally commissioned, and never appeared in the Navy list, but that the prefix HMS has been applied in the sources nevertheless. Well done with the Cameron class as well by the way. When I found the Clan Line, it was serving as a redirect for this, so it's great to see some related expansions. Kind regards, Benea (talk) 05:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French theatre/opera

Hi. I see you have just done Mélésville. That's great because he was on the 'To do' list of the Opera Project. We've got a few more potential subjects listed. Perhaps our project may be of interest to you? There are also a lot of French writers in the List of opera librettists. Best. -- Kleinzach (talk) 11:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]