User talk:Neddyfram

Welcome

Hello, Neddyfram, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 16:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Special Air Service, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - wolf 17:01, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Your revert

You've been here a week and have a total of 23 edits. So how about not getting into any editing disputes until you know your way around a little better, sound good? Start with the 'welcome' template I've added above. Read through it... all of it, including the links it contains. There is plenty of useful information for a new user like yourself. Then read the notice I placed about sourcing (including the links). We don't use forums as a source to support our content. I took a quick look at the page for the image, and there may be sourcing issues there as well, but that is different from the SAS article. If, after doing all the reading I've suggested, you still wish to contest the revert of your edit, then do not revert again, start a discussion on the article talk page. Continued reverts, especially of improperly sourced content, can lead to your account being blocked for edit-warring and disruptive editing. Slow down and learn your way around. - wolf 17:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Here are some genuine Dutch stroopwafels for you, Fram old boy. YoungstownToast (talk) 02:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

yum Neddyfram (talk) 15:37, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Your edits at the "Rhodesian Front" article

One of the main principles of Wikipedia is that we use reliable sources, see WP:V and WP:RS. When you repeatedly use as an argument in your edit summaries that the Rhodesian Front is not a white supremacist party and similar, that is your personal opinion, which of course you are entitled to have. But in Wikipedia we report what reliable sources say, not what we personally know (or think we know). This is called original research, see WP:OR. In the case of Rhodesian Front, there are many reliable sources describing it as a white supremacist party. This has been established in the talk page discussion here.

Another main principle of Wikipedia is that its content is decided by consensus, see WP:CONSENSUS. In this case, there has recently been a thorough request for comments discussion in the talk page, and there was a clear consensus: The consensus is that "White supremacy" should be included in the "Ideology" list of the infobox based on how reliable sources have described the political party. Repeatedly removing this from the article constitutes edit warring, see WP:EDITWAR, which may lead to removal of editing priveleges.

I will give you the chance to self revert. Regards! --T*U (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Hello from a fellow supporter of Rhodesia! I think we have a good deal in common, and I hope we can get in touch! OctaviusMagnusDux (talk) 23:28, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)