User talk:Necmate

Am I Japanese?

Anti-Japanese sentiment

In reference to your edits:[1], [2], [3], [4], [5]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anti-Japanese sentiment. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Thank you. (Icactus 18:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

In reference to your edits:[6], [7], [8], [9], [10]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to anti-Japanese sentiment, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (Icactus 18:53, 16 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Re:Korea under Japanese rule

You need verifiable sources to add such information to the page worded in the format you typed. Also, there is already a section devoted to that part of history: Controversial statements regarding Japanese rule in Korea. If you feel there is something worth noting, please bring the issue up on the article's talk page. Avoid any non-neutral resources; I suggest reading these policies: WP:NPOV, WP:RS, and WP:NOT before further edits are made. on camera^(t) 14:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thnak you. I wish to express my gratitude for your having given it according to the discussion. --Necmate 14:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... I don't know why you want to discuss Korea with me, thus if you have any issues concerning Korean-related topics, use those article's talk pages to settle any content disputes or to discuss changes to those specific articles. That's the best way to avoid disputes on Wikipedia. Best regards, on camera^(t) 14:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japan and Korea's relations are very bad as know. Therefore, foreigner's mediator is important. I hope you mediate the controversy of Japan and Korea. --Necmate 13:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comfort women

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Comfort women. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--Endroit 09:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Sonata

Hey Necmate! I'd like to tell you that the method of validation that you advocate is WP:OR. It is simply unnecessary for us to list certain dramas that succeeded in Japan. To do so is original research because you shape your own thesis by using articles about how those individual dramas succeeded in Japan (not necessarily a reason why many dramas succeeded in Japan).

At the same time, I already gave a link to an article that stated that many S. Korean movie/drama productions are successful in Japan. Now, that is not original research & is good enough for the article to say "one of many successful dramas".

The reason why we want "one of many successful dramas" instead of "the successful drama" is that, as an encyclopedia, Wikipedia has to be generic b/c generic means NPOV & accurate. It's like true & false. Most statements that claim an absolute truth are false. Same here. It's simply un-encyclopedic to give Winter Sonata as the singlemost example of Korean dramas that succeeded in Japan. Why? Because readers think, "so what if a single drama was popular in Japan? That doesn't tell me anything." (Wikimachine 00:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

You can teach to me if there is a South Korea drama that succeeds really besides the winter sonata.

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:ShinjukuXYZ. Thank you. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 13:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joji Obara article

See the talk page. Let's ask for a third opinion instead of constant reverting. Mackan 14:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your discussion with Mackan off my talk page. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 14:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Samtheboy, you will be blocked from editing. --Samtheboy ^(t/c) 14:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Chemical Weapons damage China today(Anti-Japanese sentiment)

Don't delete my addition of Japanese Chemical Weapons in China. More than 700,000 pieces of Japanese Chemical weapons were buried in China by Japanese troops at the end of WWII to hide war crimes. The site information of chemical weapon was all destroyed by Japan as well. This is a violation of international law, a serious war crime. Those rotten chemical weapons has become a life threatening hazard, more than 2000 Chinese civilians have been injured, even killed since 1945. Japan is required to clean up by 2007 according to UN Chemical Weapons Convention.[11] However, Japan has repeatedly delayed the clean up until 2012.

Most of the world's people don't know thatChinese civilians are still injured and killed by Japanese Chemical weapons today. Can't anyone blame China for not liking Japan? Japan should appologize for delaying cleanup of chemical weapons and for injuring Chinese people. Japan should pay for health damage and pollution of Japanese Chemical weapons to Chinese environment in past 60 years. So I warn you, don't delete those facts. Redcloud822 21:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese people should hate Chinese people. China has killed more Chinese people, than every other nation combined. WW2 has been over for 60years, all of Europe and USA has forgotten, only China and Korea and still complaining. China should spend more time thinking about giving Tibet freedom, letting Taiwan enjoy their independence and having no more executions.Sennen goroshi 15:05, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser procedure

Hi, I moved your request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mackan. I am not listing it yet, because the case needs a lot of formatting before being run. Could you please provide the diffs (ie the link comparing the versions) of the moves that could constitute a 3RR violation? You provided the direct links to a lot of versions instead of the diffs. Thanks a lot, that would help the checkusers to examinate your request. -- lucasbfr ^talk, checkuser clerk, 23:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I listed it, there was a problem with the timestamps you provided, so you might want to check it again :) -- lucasbfr ^talk, checkuser clerk, 12:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]