User talk:Necesitoayuda10

May 2023

Hello, I'm Tropicalkitty. An edit you recently made to Lag BaOmer seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tropicalkitty (talk) 03:39, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tropicalkitty I did not know how to revert the changes to those of Ar2332 Necesitoayuda10 (talk) 03:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Will D. Skies had already removed that edit. Thanks for the reply, and apologies for any inconvenience by the notice. Tropicalkitty (talk) 03:52, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcoming and warning old users

Hi, Necesitoayuda10. Thank you for your interest in welcoming users and reverting vandalism. Please make sure not to welcome or warn users who have not edited in considerable periods of time. Also, never place a block template on a user's talkpage if the blocking admin did not do so. Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add to this: you also should generally only welcome/warn users who've actually edited before ([1][2]). –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 04:19, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Necesitoayuda10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't do anything, I welcome users, and I don't know what I did, I didn't do anything, they blocked me for no reason. 1: what I do is say hello and warn users. The one who has blocked me is Materialscientist. User Materialscientist made a mistake, and you need to fix that mistake. I don't know why he blocked me. And on top of that, I block myself indefinitely. It must unblock me because I didn't do anything, I don't know why that user blocks innocent users It must unblock me, I didn't do anything :( I welcome users, and warn users, and I didn't do anything, this must be a mistake because I didn't do anything :(

Decline reason:

I'm afraid this is a WP:checkuser/WP:sockpuppetry block. "Certain administrators have access to a tool called CheckUser which reveals some of Wikipedia's private technical logs. CheckUser data can contribute to a finding that a user has abused multiple accounts (sockpuppetry). If your account is "CheckUser blocked", that means that you were blocked for sockpuppetry and that CheckUser data was relevant to the decision. ... You may appeal your block to the Arbitration Committee by email." It's arbcom-enwikimedia.org. Sorry, but I cannot help you.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Deepfriedokra You must unblock my account, I used this account because I didn't want to use the other account. --Necesitoayuda10 (talk) 03:31, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, no. Without first consulting with a CheckUser, administrators must not undo or loosen any block that is specifically identified as a "checkuser" block, ... A reversal or alteration of such a block without prior consultation may result in removal of permissions. And besides, you are admitting use of multiple accounts, so no.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]