User talk:Nebilla41

PLEASE NOTE: If your message is related to a disputed edit, the best thing to do is open a discussion on the talkpage of the article instead of leaving a message here. This way we may involve as many editors as possible instead of confining the discussion here. Wikipedia is a community effort. Let's use this community component. Thank you.

Ways to improve University of Mediterranean Karpasia

Hi, I'm Olowe2011. Nebilla41, thanks for creating University of Mediterranean Karpasia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Your page, University of Mediterranean Karpasia is interesting and I look forward to reading more however, there are lack of references. If you would like further assistance please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 15:33, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus dispute

Well done. --E4024 (talk) 13:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Kareklas also in the intervention-invasion dispute. As you may see at the relevant pages, even the RoC calls it "intervention". Thanks and greetings. --E4024 (talk) 10:47, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another golden rule of WP is that every principle is implemented from a personal angle, at least for certain users, if an edit is sympathetic to their POV they may accept anything, or reject everything in the opposite case. I mean having double standards is the basic approach for some users. You may see many examples of this attitude especially in the articles (but not limited to them) covering the area of the former Ottoman Empire. For some of the best examples of what I am referring to as "double standards" you may like to see the Turkish invasion of Cyprus article. Do not dispair, patience is the key... All the best. --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dr k

nebilla - from my own experience, (Personal attack removed) if it continues to be a problem, you can report him. it won't be the first time he has been involved in edit warring and the like. no promises who wins - that depends on the merits of the case, but it is worth getting a solid answer. Soosim (talk) 13:20, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justice Forever for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 21:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Justice Forever (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]