User talk:Ncurses

Welcome!

Hello, Ncurses, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

-Poli (talk • contribs) 02:52, 2005 July 29 (UTC)

Oasis

Oasis are a European band, Europeans say "are" not "is" with regards to collective nouns, so far as I know. Therefore Oasis are an English rock band. We don't use Americanisms on English Pages. Back off Brussels. Nice tennis ball BTW.--Crestville 14:04, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Llama (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Programming Perl 3rd.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Programming Perl 3rd.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

don't care

AfD nomination of Gentleman's bet

I have nominated Gentleman's bet, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gentleman's bet. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Justin^(Gmail?)_(u) 04:03, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok

Proposed deletion of Croquet whites

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Croquet whites, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not a widely used term (not mentioned in croquet article, few GHits) & no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ThaddeusB (talk) 21:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The existence of tornadoes is scientifically confirmed

If you don't believe that tornadoes exist, please read the following articles:

serioushat 01:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]