User talk:Nblund/Archives/2019/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nblund. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
False accusation of rape
I did some googling re this. If you're interested in pursuing it, you might start here. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for sending, User:Wtmitchell. IMHO: if we need to file a FOIA request and wait a year just to read a paper, then it's probably undue for inclusion! Nblund talk 23:29, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
List of scientists...
I missed that AFD, but thanks for nominating it. I've thought for years that the article ran afoul of a lot of policies, but with so many unsuccessful AFDs in the past, that it wasn't worth nominating again. Thank you for that! Guettarda (talk) 19:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
CESNUR article
Since you recently commented on the ANI thread about an organized promotion effort related to CESNUR, I'd like to ask you to help review that organization's article here on Wikipedia. In an attempt to comply with the spirit of WP:CANVAS, the same message is being sent to everyone who commented on the ANI thread, and no specific editing-conflict is being referenced: the article could simply benefit from more eyeballs. Feoffer (talk) 08:22, 26 November 2019 (UTC)