User talk:Nbhard
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joachim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hadith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Please avoid the phrase "Prophet Muhammad"
[edit]I suggest you read MOS:ISLAM. We don't often use "Jesus Christ" either. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:03, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Talk page posts
[edit]Hello again Nbhard. I answered to your post at my talk page. I noticed that it was however misplaced and unsigned (and indadvertently deleted the title of another post). So I would just like to remind you to place new posts at the end/bottom of talk pages and to make sure to sign them by appending four tildes (~~~~). Also, when replying to another comment, prefixing them with columns (:) will indent the post so that threads are easy to follow. And thank you for participating in discussions, because that's how we can form WP:CONSENSUS about article content. —PaleoNeonate – 00:54, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I have reverted the IP editor again. I am not very familiar with Zoroaster but my first impulse was to revert their last edit. After looking into the edit history I see they have already run into trouble with Uanfala from another address so I am assuming the edits are bad. Is there any validity to their changes at all? —DIYeditor (talk) 04:21, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- @DIYeditor:,
- Thank you for your post regarding the Zoroaster article. It seems like the individual is removing sections of the article without rhyme or reason. I'm not familiar with this person's IP address nor have I had any discussions with :the individual, but I did notice that the user removed my post without leaving any comments or dialogue which comes across as suspicious. The information that I posted was actually taken from scholarly/historical narratives dated to the Abbasid Empire ~800 AD and this has been cited in the article. The main purpose of me adding that information was to present narratives from other schools of thought to provide the reader with a comprehensive understanding in the spirit of spreading knowledge. Thank you for reverting the deletion. Nbhard (talk) 05:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- Well I think we need someone familiar with this topic to review his other changes, I guess I will comment on the talk page. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aqiqah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abu Talib (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Nbhard. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |