User talk:Nbedworth

User:Digitaldirect deleted

I have speedily deleted the above userpage again. Please see my recent post to User talk:Digitaldirect for the reason it was deleted previously and has been again. Some of the relevant links posted their include WP:NOTADVERTISING, Wikipedia:Spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business. Please don't re-create this content again. It is not suitable for Wikipedia which is an encyclopedia and not an advertising service.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The present content contains a broad overview of online advertising, and particular, what DigitalDirect is doing in this area. Certainly the tone and content of this article are appropriate for an encyclopedia. Please check it out again.

A different admin has deleted the article again. I looked at the content of that newly deleted article and it appears to me to be the epitome of blatant advertising.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take at look at the Peer 39 Wiki page, where they present a company and product focussed presentation, without really saying much about semantic UX and advertising. Clearly, the only purpose of the Peer 39 article is to promote the company.

Because we're one of the leading research companies in this space, naturally we believe that what we're doing is both noteworthy and specific to us. How do we communicate what's going on without running afoul of your style rules?

Basically, you don't. If someone wishes to write an article about your company, drawing upon reliable sources, devoid of conflict of interest, and with a neutral point of view, that would be great. But you don't get to promote your own company, period. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 04:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]