User talk:Nayabks

July 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pakistani hip hop music, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 03:16, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend you to not edit my changes as you have been doing, because your changes are inappropriate as you are overrating a rapper above the more popular ones. If you wish, you can edit and site the sources for me to make the page better. But don't edit the contents and make the article inauthentic.

Thank you. Nayabks (talk) 03:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing matters

I see that you have already been told about the need for reliable sources for content you add to articles. Perhaps even more importantly, you should not remove sources for information which is already in an article, unless there are very good reasons why the sources are unsuitable, in which case you need to explain why.
If contrent of an article is removed because of a lack of sourcing, Wikipedia policy is that it must not be restored without providing a reliable source.
Again, please don't remove maintenance tempaltes without dealing with the issues they refer to.
It is probably better if you don't try to correcdt English. You have replaced a perfectly correct use of the possessive "its" with a mistaken use of "it's", which is not a possessive, but an abbreviation of "it is".
All content of Wikipedia articles needs to be written from a neutral point of view, and there should be no expression of opinions or judgements. An article should not say that someone is "of the finest caliber", that their work is "positive", that they have "lyrical talent", that something is "irrelevant", and so on and so on.
At Pakistani hip hop music you have three times made substantially the same edit, in the face of your changes having been reverted. Wikipeida works by collaboration, and when editors disagree about contnt they should discuss the issues involved, with a view to trying to freach agreeement, not simply keep reverting to their preferred version, presumably in the hope that eventually other editors will give up. If we adopted that method to resolve disagreements, the result would simply be that the most stubborn editors would always eventually get their way, which would not be beneficial. This kind of repeated restoration of one's own preferred version of an article, known as "edit-warring", is considered disruptive, and if it continues an administrator may block teh editors involved from editing, to prevent further disruption. If you wish to read furtehr detail on this, please see the Wikipedia policy on edit-warring.
At Pakistani hip hop music you replaced a list of subgenres with a link to the article Genre. Was that a mistake? I can't see any conceivable reason why anyone would do that deliberately. Assuming it was a mistake, you should reverse your change. JBW (talk) 11:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JBW,

I have only been replacing the inauthentic facts with the authentic ones. Because I am aware that an editor here has an interest (that I can prove). Can you please point out which facts require sourcing? I will do my best to cite the best sources available.
Can you point out the maintenance template I have removed? I will resolve the issue it was about if I haven't.
It must be a typo, my bad. I'll be more careful about this one.
Noted, I was only stating the public opinion. Is that allowed or do we have to be 100% objective?
I have been edit-warring in reaction because there is a group of Pakistani rappers that is constantly changing this page in its interest, they are not known but are constantly putting their names at the top of the mentioned lists. Honestly, I am all for collaborations but in such situations, there is really no other choice but to enforce the just edits. I had sought an administrator's attention for this matter but it was not responded to. So this was my last resort.
I don't get this point about the genre/sub-genre and can't find the edit in the article. If it is inappropriate can you please edit that for me, I will be grateful.

Nayabks (talk) 02:51, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laundry By Time Signature (February 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hugsyrup were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Laundry By Time Signature and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Laundry By Time Signature, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hug^syrup 10:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nayabks! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hug^syrup 10:52, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Laundry By Time Signature concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Laundry By Time Signature, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:57, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Laundry By Time Signature

Hello, Nayabks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Laundry By Time Signature".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 11:22, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]