User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 55

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Rainelemental

Hey NawlinWiki,

I'm a donation contributor of Wiki, I believe that should give me some benefits. Anyway you deleted the RainTPL page, which is a template engine, like Smarty. It's open source and no profit since 2007 and many developers uses it in their projects, also Rain_Framework which is on wiki in different language uses the RainTPL.

The page was deleted 3 times, the first time somebody wrote and reported it to me, the second time and the third I wrote the wiki, and I still don't understand what is wrong with it, because it's practically the same of Smarty pages, just with a small different description and different links.

Please let me know how to procede for the right direction

Thanks and Regards.

rainelemental (talk) 6:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)rainelemental

Erika M Anderson

Hi, you deleted this page before it was completed. EMA is a signed artist with albums available on Amazon/Itunes. She is with a major record label and her albums have been reviews in the major press. She needs a wikipedia page for this reason. http://www.pitchfork.com/artists/29348-ema/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2011/may/08/ema-past-life-martyred-saints-review http://www.amazon.co.uk/Past-Life-Martyred-Saints-Ema/dp/B004GLDNW6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1305666560&sr=8-1 Here are links to her reviews at pitchfork, and amazon. I am happy to complete the page with more citations...i was half way through when deleted. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sercomdj01 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to repost a completed article with the sources included. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Gorgeous Mess

Hello NawlinWiki,

I hope you are well.

I had just done a page that was an experiment. I didn't have time to flesh it out so to speak and you promptly (to the second it seemed) deleted it siting Unambiguous advertising or promotion. Fair enough. But I want to know where can I practice writing a wiki article, with references, external links, and reliable sources for Erb and Erb? Secondly, how is it other companies, such as H.L. Staebler's have a site in wikipedia if this unambiguous promotion is an issue?

Thanks for your guidance.

A Gorgeous Mess (talk) 20:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)A Gorgeous Mess[reply]

Recreating article on Nous Infosystems

Hi Nawlin, I had created and article on a firm called Nous Infosystems which was speedily deleted and lack of notability was quoted as the reason. Nous Infosystems is company with estimated revenues of USD 22 Million (as per a press release in 2007) and had over 700 employees in 2006 (as per a press release). Given its size in terms of revenues and number of employees, I believe the firm is notable for a wiki article and hence am recreating the article while adding references to all relevant articles. Please do drop me a message on my talk page if you believe more details/clarification is required.

Jayanth2011 (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Jayanth2011[reply]

I'm curious

For some reason, you're on my watch list. I bet 3 or 4 times a week, something is being protect or redacted or something on this page. Why are you so popular? OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 04:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat vandals don't like being repeatedly blocked. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 399

Hi NawlinWiki. If you have a spare minute this week, could you look at 399 ? I'd like to re-enable it, but apparently it consumes too many conditions. Is there any obvious optimizations that can be done? Thanks, 28bytes (talk) 18:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nawlin. May I ask why you blacklisted hurryupharry.org for the activities of one runtshit, in November 2010? Why did you associate the former with the latter?

Having enquired, I understand he is likely to be one Stephen Plaut: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Plaut

He has nothing to do with Harry's Place, indeed was banned from it from commenting in its threads.

zkharya≈≈≈≈ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zkharya (talk • contribs) 20:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was posting links to his comments on Harry's Place. Are those gone now? NawlinWiki (talk) 23:19, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cartesian demon

Protected Cartesian demon: no reason to edit or move this redirect without discussion 'cept the encyclopedia anyone can edit thing... and the target being renamed... =)

Talk:Evil demon#Requested move Thanks—Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 05:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More ross blocks

See [1]

I bring you this and you didn't even add me on facebook :D Egg Centric 23:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's because he doesn't trust a word you say, and rightly so! 82.25.188.231 (talk) 10:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erie Anime Experience

I want to know why you deleted erie anime experience page, if you don't allow anime convention pages then delete them all not just the ones you dislike. Now I know why the trade school I went to said not to trust anything on this site. You say to keep it neutral, the page was wrote with facts, that can be found on the EAE site as well as animecons.com and many more. I should tell everyone that Wiki is to bias and only allows content that the Admins want/like and heck with everyone else. (Kenshinkyo (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)).[reply]

Bangor, Iowa

Hi NawlinWiki,

Back in 2010, you deleted Bangor, Iowa as a G3: Blatant hoax. Although the material in the article was not well-written, the article is not a hoax, and the content in the article was pretty accurate. I have recreated the article, sourcing the new article to reliable sources, but wanted you to be aware that there was an issue with this speedy deletion. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 20:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, article seems fine now. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DID YOU DELETE MY PAGES?!?!

YOU DELETED PERSEPHONE'S DREAM! WHY?????????????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chicken200 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because the article didn't state how the band met the notability requirements of WP:MUSIC, and didn't cite any sources as required by WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help with article

Hi NawlinWiki. I'm new to this Wikipedia stuff and could use some guidance. I don't quite get how to do it yet. My article DfR Solutions LLC was deleted. Can you help me by pointing out specific content that needs to be fixed in order for it to be acceptable? ThanksIgnitionMarketing (talk) 14:32, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was written in a promotional style, which is not surprising given that your username indicates that you are a public relations agency. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delete other 'Blatent Advertising' Pages then???

Hi, You deleted my page - OK, I can take that hit... But what I don't understand is why this page is allowed to stay: Anglian Home Improvements???

AmeliaVargo (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's gone, but see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I didn't know about the 'Other Stuff Exists' rule - I honestly only added the original page because the Anglian page was there... By the way, how can I get an article on my client added? They are a big UK company, so I don't think it's entirely unwarranted for them to have a page in Wikipedia - but obviously I don't want to waste you or any other wiki editor's time to write something only for it to be removed straight away... I've read the guidelines, but my problem was the client rewrote my article to such a degree that it wasn't the same article... I know you hate internet marketing types - but if you could help me do better, I would greatly appreciate it, and think Wikipedia would be better for it. Thank you. AmeliaVargo (talk) 10:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rejected article

hi, my article was rejected and i dont understand why —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayanipony (talk • contribs) 03:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hippocrasy is one thing, pretending to be an open source is another

This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia articles cover notable topics—those that have gained significant and enduring notice by the world at large, and are not excluded for other reasons. We consider evidence from reliable independent sources such as published journals, books, and newspapers to determine if the world has shown "significant enough notice" for an encyclopedia article. Notability does not directly affect the content of articles, but only their existence.

if thats the case why my article was rejected, I have used my 'source' for 6 months, it's a book and I even called the publishers! I feel sorry for wikipedia and perhaps I should write an article quoting wikipedia and it's ineptitude in doing the opposite of what it says it reason for living - try walking into a pizza joint clearly advertised as such but it turns out to be a public toilet —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayanipony (talk • contribs) 06:56, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

13:03, 17 May 2011 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Komikoo.com" ‎ (A7: No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content): Multiple reasons: Speedy deletion criteria G11, A7)

Hey Nawlin, You've speedily deleted my article: Komikoo.com. Could you please elaborate on the reasons you did it? If significance is the issue, I wonder if I put up the number of user the website has or the number of pageviews it generates per day would solve this problem? Also, Komikoo.com is the first member generated comic portal in Indonesia, this fact itself makes this website a considerable player in reviving the country's comic Industry. I think this is pretty significant in itself.

Will those facts help the eligibility of this article? If not, please let me know what I can do to make the article eligible.

Thanks in advance

Iqbalbaskara (talk) 13:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arthritis Support

I saw that you CSD:A7 deleted this article. It was re-created by what appears to be the same user. Take a look and see if it is the same and potentially issue a sterner warning about creating articles. Thank you Hasteur (talk) 13:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AccuRev

You deleted the article "AccuRev" I wrote earlier today citing G11 as the reason for deletion. As stated in G11, "An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion." Using the WP:OTHERSTUFF argument, I believe this article is written in the same neutral tone as the following articles on similar topics: Perforce, MKS Integrity,StarTeam, Plastic SCM, IBM Rational Team Concert, IBM Rational ClearCase, Telelogic Synergy, and in fact, many other articles on commercial software. If you do not believe this style of writing qualifies as neutral, I ask that you delete these articles as well for the purpose of consistency. Thank you, --9229140W (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Deleting my Hulk Hogan edit.

Hi

Hi NawlinWiki. You're talk page is full of complaints or disagreements (mostly negative feelings), so I just wanted to stop by and leave a cookie and say keep up the good work. You're one of the best CSD admins around.--v/r - T P 21:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TParis has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Aw, thanks. :) NawlinWiki (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asad pathan is up again

Hey NawlinWiki - Despite (Deletion log); 13:08 . . NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Asad pathan" (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement), article is on foot again - --Shirt58 (talk) 13:41, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Cort Webber and Bobby "Fatboy" Roberts

This is a courtesy notice given your prior involvement with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cort and Fatboy or its deletion review (Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 April 10) that these related articles are currently listed at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cort Webber. As attribution issues are involved, closure of this current AfD may result in the restoration of the earlier article, as a list of contributors would be necessary if the articles are retained. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:58, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

klagoy

Hello, a page that I was creating called CarrierRate.com was deleted before completion. I was in the middle of working on the content. How do I proceed? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klagoy (talk • contribs) 20:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Love (Kelly Chen album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love (Kelly Chen album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love (Kelly Chen album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 21:06, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

==Hellow (about sid roams) Hellow. I have to ask something. two das ago I created a page for the production group "Sid Roams". I worked on t for 4 hours. it wa hard. and you deleted it. can i re-post it? because i don't know what's wrong whith it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punkis23 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article did not cite any sources to show that the subject was notable per the guidelines at WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block Exemption Regulation

Hi, please see a draft of what I have in mind for the page Block Exemption Regulation article and some of my references to the topic in my talk page. Let me know if this is okay and I will build more on it. Tomidetogun (talk) 19:10, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you requested I a have re-written the BER article on my talk page and added references to each sentence. I have also added more comments to the entire article. Kindly take a look again and let me know if it can be publiched now. 83.109.40.230 (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About Legal Understudy Intergrated Secretly

Hi NW - article you deleted a few hours ago is now up and running again, this time essay-like and tagged as such. Apologies if I'm telling you things you already know! --Shirt58 (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I am led to believe young people these days say, kthxbye. --Shirt58 (talk) 13:48, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ariztical Entertainment

Please undelete Ariztical Entertainment. It is an article stub about a film production/distribution house. There were a dozen articles which linked to it, and several others which mentioned it, but did not link to it yet. I marked it as a stub, and was going to flesh out more of a page when I was able to track down everything that linked there. Of course, your deletion of the page hurts my ability to see what links there. I'm disappointed to see such careless, harmful editing. samwaltz (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The entire content of the article was "Ariztical Entertainment is a small film production/distribution company.". It stayed like that for an hour and a half. It's really not even worth it to post placeholder pages like that - just recreate the article when you have more to write (with, of course, sources showing how the company is notable per WP:CORP)). NawlinWiki (talk) 00:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- It's not worth it? Are you telling me what's worth my time? Please don't project. samwaltz (talk) 19:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TwinStrata article deletion

Hello, NawlinWiki-

I had recently created an article for TwinStrata, Inc. The article was deleted about a month ago due to A7: ...does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. I would like to have a better understanding of how we didn't meet this requirement. StorSimple, a close competitor of ours, appears to have met the requirements for publishing, which leads me to believe that our article should as well.

Please help me to understand what we could do differently to republish the TwinStrata article with success.

Thank you for your consideration.

Trolicki (talk) 21:30, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm what's called a talk page stalker ;). Let me see if I can help you out. I can't see your original article, but it was likily deleted for one of these two reasons: 1) It didn't have reliable sources to support the material, and/or 2) there was no claim of significance. That said, I think you can have an article. Doing a few google searches, I came up on several sources you could use. The strongest is going to be this article if the award pans out: that is to say your company wins. However, I have other sources such as here, and here. If you use these sources to build your article, and others that you may know of, you could potentially have an article. I think it's important to stress the significance of your cloud storage backup software as innovative and leading the market; similar to StorSimple. Good luck and happy editing!--v/r - T P 22:46, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to add on to my last sentence. By "stress the significance" I mean to use 3rd party NPOV sources that support the significance. Do not add promotional material.--v/r - T P 11:53, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User Humphreyking's contributions

Hi, NawlinWiki! I noticed you appropriately redirected Seto Shmack and speedied Fold (band) created by Humphreyking (talk · contribs). Thanks for that. Could you also take a look at his other day-one contributions, viz.

The copyvio on that last one is a problem, but all the redlinks seem more ominous, as they do at Mujaji, which you rightly tagged for notability ). I think Shadow Records probably also needs to go. I saw nothing about it on Google, Google News (last 30 days), and just very little on Google News Archive.

Then there was this addition of 14 bands to the Downtempo article. Not quite sure what to make of that.

Looks to me like our new friend is some sort of PR agent. Sorry not to deal with this myself, but learning the "ropes" re bandspam, and figuring out which deletion criteria to use would for all these, let alone counselling their creator, would take me two hours, at least. Thanks; if you'd like to reply at all, you can do so here, as I've temporarily watchlisted this page. Best, – OhioStandard (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page completed but was deleted

Hi Nawlin, page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kimleemodel was deleted, but has since been update with reference and believe it deserves a second look. Thank you(Kimleemodel (talk) 05:18, 27 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]

RevDel request

Please RevDel this edit under CFRD #2, if possible. This edit by the same user is borderline but only identifies the subject by a rather common first name and thus might not fall under the criteria, but I'd like you to adjudicate. Thanks. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Those two links are to the same edit, but I've RevDel'd it and the user's other edit (which was borderline, but given the first...) and blocked the user. Nobody needs a warning to relaise that that's not acceptable behaviour. Just FYI, it's usually best to send RevDel requests by email to an admin or admins you know are active, so that as few people as possible see the edit (and to avoid the Streisand effect). HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:26, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HJ – thanks for pointing out my mistake and for taking the action you did. I will take your advice regarding notifying via email under advisement. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:35, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Maldonado

How can that be an 'expired PROD', when it was only created a few hours ago? Chzz ► 13:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I used speedy category a7 in my edit summary, but forgot to remove the prod edit summary - sorry. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:12, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you certain it met the A7 requirement? I thought it had some claim (I don't exactly remember) about an award, and there was at least one ref that I think sounded reasonable. The author was showing a willingness to at least try to improve the article - see User talk:StormFerrari - so speedy deletion seems a bit bitey? Chzz ► 15:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't see the claim to bona fide notability here. He won an award that appears to be just recognition (in a Youtube video) by a single other musician. The only independent source (the Ultima Music link) is a review on a blog. He's unsigned, entirely self-produced, and doesn't appear to meet any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re. WP:MUSIC - I quote from A7, "even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines" Chzz ► 01:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me for dropping in, but if the article stated he won an award, that was enough to pass A7 in my view. I would therefore request the article be undeleted and either prodded or sent to AFD to let consensus decide. ArcAngel (talk) ) 01:23, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, alright, sending to AFD. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (sincerely) and - I hope this won't sound like I'm a wonk, but... would you mind telling the article creator about the AfD? Just that, if I do, it's 'from' the wrong person, as it were. Ta. Honestly, thanks. Chzz ► 03:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. Really really, I'm not taking the piss here; the artist may or may not be notable, but the new user seems to be making efforts to imrpove it. Maybe it'll be deleted / userfied, maybe he'll become notable in a year or two, who knows. a 15 year old guitar player; borderline/dubious N but that isn't the point; new user was learning good stuff. Maybe StormFerrari (talk · contribs) will get interested in Wikipedia, and add some good stuff. I admit, 99/100 that won't happen - but it's the 1% I work on.

Cheers, Chzz ► 03:14, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy's

Hi. I fubar'ed this page merge. Did I handle it correctly with the null edit or is there something else I need to do to comply with the content license?--v/r - T P 12:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks ok to me, all the history is there in both the main article and the redirect. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No one does it better than you, bro.

I'd stricken the idiot comments left in that latest coordinated attack on your talk page, but another user thought it best that they remain visible. I struck them because I am utterly sick and tired of seeing these almost daily attacks on you. One has to admire a person for the enemies he keeps; given the sheer number of enemies you seem to have created, I can say in all honesty that I admire you greatly and this entire site owes you a debt of gratitude which can never be repayed. Heaven knows I've given up numerous times over personal attacks; you never have. There is no Barnstar big enough to do you honor, so please accept my thanks and the thanks of countless other users for your dedication, your hard work and your commitment. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded.--v/r - T P 01:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Vallum Award for Poetry

Dear NawlinWiki, I noticed you deleted The Vallum Award for Poetry from the Poetry Awards page. Please note that our contest is one of the bigger contests in Canada. Vallum: New International Poetics is a very well-respected poetry journal in Canada which publishes many Americans and other international poets. We are exlusively publishers of poetry and have a national distribution and supply our magazines to chain literary outlets like Chapters/Indigo and Borders. We have published very famous poets like: Paul Muldoon, Franz Wright, Charles Simic, Erin Mourse, Stephen Dunn, Fanny Howe, George Elliott Clarke, Les Murray, John Kinsella, and many many more famous poets. We advertise in the American Poetry Review and in Poetry Magazine, two respected and established American magazines. I realize that the Canadian poetry community is not as big as the American one, but Vallum magazine is one of Canada's best journals that holds an annual contest which is far superior to the Shaunt Basmajinian Chapbook contest, for instance. We, here at Vallum, would humbly appreciate it very much if you can undelete our entry. I am not sure if I will receive an answer from you or how to look for one on Wiki. Thank you for being vigilant with Wiki entries, and I hope you will continue to be an effective administrator. Sincerely, Eleni at Vallum magazine. Eleniz (talk) 02:02, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AbuseFilter

It's that time again. :) Try to pull as much as is possible out please, I'm probably going to cycle through and reevaluate old filters on my next pass through, so the more free conditions available, the better. Thanks, Prodego ^talk 05:03, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cellar spider

A routine edit/move protection of yours has been queried on VPP. Perhaps it would be symbolically good to terminate this one now after more than two years? Anyway, just thought I'd bring it to your attention. Regards, - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 13:52, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Zbiddy page

Prior to the deletion of the Zbiddy page according to section A7, I contested its deletion on the basis of the site's growing popularity and number of users. I asked if the addition of references that demonstrate its notability would help, but I did not receive a reply. Did you see my comment before deleting the talk page associated with Zbiddy? Can you please provide guidance on how the page can be restored? I don't contribute much to Wikipedia, but I've posted a few articles about companies I've found that are notable but don't yet have pages. Most of the time they stick. I'm curious to know why the others stick, but this one didn't. I don't want to waste time contributing content that will be removed. Thanks for your help, since I'm not too experienced with this. Sethdillon (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please reply and give me some guidance here? Thank you Sethdillon (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patiently awaiting your reply...Sethdillon (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two O'Clock Lab Band

Looking for some leniency ... Would it be permissible to add back the musicians (the ones you removed that don't yet have a wp entry)? I can add them back hyper linked or not hyper linked. They are notable; and listing them serves as a reminder to editors to build entries. Those poor jazzers are more esoteric than pop-musicians but, nonetheless, are worthy of editorial advocacy. My sense is that the notoriety litmus test we seek for popular artists is relaxed for chamber musicians and jazz artists. The jazzers in question are established recording artist or jazz educators or both. Their bios (on the hyperlinks) serve as a bare-bones, self-evident indicator of notoriety that eventually should be developed. To a degree, listing the names (with hyperlinks) also supports the notoriety of the entry. Eurodog 17:38, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Povinia

Is user:Povinia Vanatoru? Also 89.123.14.187 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Saw on AIV, figured it was likely true but wanted to check. Thank you. —Soap— 17:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, blocked and filters updated. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:BiggKhrisco Deletion

Hello Mr. NawlinWiki, I was in NO WAY intentionally promoting myself on my page, I was just writing a biography of myself. It just so happens that I am an artist. I did not know that you could not put info regarding yourself on your own page. I apologize for my ignorance to this matter. I now would like to know if there is ANY way possible for me to reinstate my page. I will try not to break the rules again. BiggKhrisco (talk) 00:53, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try building it at Articles for Creation with strong references that are independent of you; or alternatively you could add it to Wikipedia:Requested_articles. As a third option, you could asl Wikipedia:WikiProject_Arts to try building the article.--v/r - T P 01:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tetsuwan atom visits the person

Though I see no need to undelete it just to correct the reason, and it wouldn't have made a plausible redirect, just in case the page creator objects to the deletion Tetsuwan atom visits the person should have been A10'ed to Astro_boy#Films. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 00:56, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]