User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 53

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

Edit summary

By coincidental timing, I noticed this edit's summary right above a couple of refdels you made for Joseph McCarthy, so figured I might as well ask you to take a look. I'm not particularly offended by the language, but some probably would be. Fat&Happy (talk) 19:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gone, thanks. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:41, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ReverbShop wiki

I just caught that you speed deleted this article due to a lack of notable content? Considering that there were 6 articles listed 1 from the company website, 2 from local sources, and the other three were from print media, one including a business week article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustinADeWitt (talk • contribs) 14:46, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sequoia edits

Hello! I saw that today at 10:36 3/1/2011 you made some edits to the Sequoia sempervirens and the Talk:Sequoia sempervirens pages (RD3, disruptive material). I'm sure you had good reason, but it just seemed odd that right when we got into a discussion/dispute about very fine details in those archives, that within hours we get hidden edits to them, whose record we can not witness. May I ask what you removed and who it was by? Many thanks! Tom Hulse (talk) 21:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a coincidence - this is part of a cleanup of old pagemove/edit summary vandalism. Nothing to do with the current dispute. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beware of RSI

You've been rev-deleting the entire afternoon. Perhaps use a different finger, to preserve your health--but thanks for giving up your body for the team. Drmies (talk) 21:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter

Hey NawlinWiki,

Mr.Z-bot (talk · contribs) made this report recently at AIV. The editor's only contribution, here, doesn't appear remotely like vandalism but it triggered Special:AbuseFilter/389 -- I'm not sure how this trips an "Attacks on user talk pages" filter. I'm completely ignorant as to how these things work, but you were apparently the last to edit the filter...thank you can figure it out? Thanks, — Scientizzle 19:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, looking at the log for the filter, it's hitting a whole lot of non-vandalism. Something seems to be wrong. — Scientizzle 19:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I adjusted the filter - should reduce or eliminate the FPs. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RevDel request

Please see the entire revision history of Moy Salinas prior to my redirecting it to Moises Salinas. I'm requesting RevDel under CFRD #2 or #3. Or if it's easier, delete the article and recreate it as a redirect. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Option 2 was faster - done. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This is still visible. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 16:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry, got it now. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

unblock of 132.74.1.4?

Hi Nawlin, Would you object against the unblock of 132.74.1.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)? An unblock request came in on unblock-l for this IP. The request indicated it is a shared university IP. Looking at the contributions, I don't see much activity, some run of the mill vandalism, some well meant but not-so-usefull edits, and some good edits. I don't like unblocking without consulting first, so let me know. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This IP has been used in the past by longtime vandal User:Runtshit, and we think it's one of his home IPs. He's still active, so I'm not comfortable unblocking this IP. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, clear. Thanks for the info, an unblock then is out of order. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

The AIV page has not received any admin attention for a whole hour.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block review

Hey Nawlin. I'm confused on this block of yours. It appears to be a good standing editor from the Hebrew Wikipedia. Could you possibly unblock him/her? --Bsa dow ski1 11:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The username matched the User:JI Hawkins meme, but I've unblocked as you requested. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 13:12, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nawlin, What was wrong with the Mark's Value Store page. The information was accurate? Please respond, PARC12 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.94.64.234 (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it did not indicate how this "relatively new" online retailer was notable per WP:WEB or WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:32, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? Sorry, I am not that amazing with computers and new to Wikipedia.

- It means we don't have articles on every business or website, just those that meet our notability requirements. Again, please click on these links: WP:WEB and WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion

Hey, I just had my article deleted... (SCREAM FOR HELP: Punk & Hardcore Bands 4 Gulf Coast Animals). I am new to editing/creating on wikipedia, however, the reasons for deletion seem offbase to me. Anything presented in the article was for the purpose of information, not advertisement/promotion. I am not affiliated with any of the parties involved in the release, and my reason for creating the article was for informational purposes only. I'm really not sure what the issue was. Daegor (talk) 23:06, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems like it's taken verbatim from the catalog notes or from the sleeve of the EP itself. Even though it's for a good cause, it still seems like it's trying to get people to buy the EP. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Much of it was, however I deleted anything that actually directed you towards any of the charitable organizations. I didn't want to remove mention of them entirely as I felt that it was educational as to the organizations behind the release, rather than advertising for them. Daegor (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Time topics

Your input would be appreciated at Template talk:Time topics#Why is this page fully protected? Best wishes, Qwfp (talk) 07:26, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help please

hi, NawlinWiki would you be willing to help me or point me to someone that could help me get this article started:

Colombian Party Cartel

we have plenty of refferences, just dont know how to make them work here... info@colombianpartycartel.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Careyjamesbalboa (talk • contribs) 22:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help wanted !

hello, do you remember me ? you wellcomed me very kindly few years ago (lol, the time is running so fast). Sorry, i didn'y improve my English since yet ! Today i'm coming to you, because i know nobody on Engish wiki, for a translation problem. Could you help me to translate into French blue chip names or explain me in English (as simple as possible) what it is about. 'Cause I've absolutlety no idea on the meaning of these words. Thanks. Louxema - 兔Talk with me on my French talk page - Angers 16:33, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filter 68

FYI, 68 seems to be producing quite a few false positives. Perhaps you could look into them when you get chance? Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adjusted. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 01:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomads Golf Club

My article on Nomads Golf Club was speedily deleted by yourself. Can you please copy the article into notepad, save, zip then send it to js@webwarmerdotnet please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlanderdownunder (talk • contribs) 03:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's already in your userspace at User:Highlanderdownunder/Nomads Golf Club - you can just copy it from there. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Am I not right in thinking that it is still a copyright violation, even in userspace? _wjemather ^bigissue 08:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PassionSearch.com

Hi NawlinWiki: I'm writing about the recently deleted PassionSearch.com page. How could I improve what had been written to merit inclusion on Wikipedia? The company itself is a notable entity, and is comparable to (if not larger than) other companies that have Wikipedia pages such as Plenty of Fish, FriendFinder, Match.com etc. The Approaching Curve (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You would have to show the company's notability per WP:CORP, as established by reliable independent sources per WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Understand Why you Tagged this Entry for Deletion

I am not sure why this page (Kim Jew) is being considered for deletion; the entry does not have any issues that would make it a candidate for deletion. The sources cited are not PR pieces, but legitimate news stories crafted by journalists, not Kim Jew himself. The breadth of sources shows that there is significant coverage of Kim Jew as a photographer; the sources are reliable news sources; the sources are written from a third party perspective; and the sources are independent of the subject. Based on this criteria, I believe that the Wikipedia entry about Kim Jew should be presumed suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Additionally, Kim Jew's notability spans decades, demonstrating that the independent coverage cited is not short-term interest.

I understand that Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion....and this entry does not read as such. It is not advocating people to take an action, it is not an opinion piece....it is written from a neutral point fo view, using an objective style to state facts about Kim Jew's life and notable contributions to the field of photography.

Please advise on why you are considering this entry for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredniferitz (talk • contribs) 18:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've stated my reasons in the AFD nomination. You should make your arguments in that discussion, not here. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pervasive DataRush Technology from Glennmad1. I've been working to build the content of the Pervasive DataRush Technology page with the focus on bringing details about technology architecture to the forefront. When you have a moment, can you please recheck. Hopefully, I now meet criteria to have the "advertisement' label removed. Thanks, Nawlin.

Ark Music Factory Deletion

I am just an average person. I heard all this kerfuffle online about Ark Music Factory. So I googled them. I wanted to know who was behind it. And whether it was a US or UK operation. All the links were rubbish except the link to wikipedia in google. By the google blurb I could see that it had information about who was behind the company and where it was based. So I clicked the link and came to a deleted page entry. I see you deleted the page. I cannot find the information anywhere else online. Google did not cache the deleted page. It was at this point I realised that wikipedia has gone to shit. And it's because of people like you, the deletionists, that it is going to shit. No doubt the big 'deleted' page will help create a chilling effect for anyone wishing to write another article on this company. Why would anyone try and start another article when people like you are just going to delete it? So I'm here to say, good one! Good on you for making me realise how crap wikipedia has become. Good on you for deleting articles that *you* think are poor rather than improving them, or marking them as needing improvement. You are a complete ass hat. Good day to you. May you continue to ruin wikipedia for everyone. Retrogradeorbit (talk) 04:46, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Friday" has recieved close to 8,000,000 views on Youtube, creating a sizable need for an objective source of information regarding how the song was created. Comprehensive coverage by the vast majority of media organizations is further proof of its necessity. Also, Retrogradeorbit makes a great point that should be echoed as I stumbled upon this deletion page in the same way. I wonder how many millions of people came to find out about Ark Music Factory before being turned away because of one subjective opinion of "importance. 174.29.34.55 (talk) 05:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. This was a stupid deletion. You are someone who definitely should not be attempting to determine relevance.

JasonFillipe39 (talk) 06:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prepare yourself sir for a trout slap. 174.29.34.55 (talk) 06:08, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Janus Thinking - entry removal

Hi,

I noticed that you removed an entry for Janus Thinking, a blog about luxury and luxury marketing. You cite that it is because it was "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Is it because of the words "leading luxury blog" only? If so, these words can be removed. Other than that, I hope that you saw that the entry was for information purposes only and that the website/blog itself is not commercial in its nature anyway.

I see that other blogs (e.g. Huffington Post) have an entry for them so I am just curious where the distinction is drawn between what it acceptable and not for an entry. While the Janus Thinking site has a more specific theme, it is already recognised by many external groups as an important site and its author is asked to speak (in an academic, non-commercial context) all over the world.

Any feedback would be appreciated...

87.113.246.63 (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The standards for website notability are at WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I have removed the citing of the website and left the entry referring only to the theoretical concept itself - of Janus Thinking. I hope this meets the standards. The concept has no commercial nature, this entry is only for informative purposes as relating to the academic work on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annafdubuis (talk • contribs) 12:27, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- You would still have to show that this concept is recognized as notable in reliable independent sources, see WP:V. Wikipedia is not meant to be a publisher of original thought, see WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. It has been widely published and used by other academics. Is it possible for you to replace the original text in order that I may edit it please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annafdubuis (talk • contribs) 15:55, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cort and Fatboy deletion

I've had this account for a while but, despite this, I'm relatively new to the world of Wikipedia. You recently deleted the article for "Cort and Fatboy" a popular radio show in Portland, Oregon. The page was deleted in February but I created a new page under the show's revised title. I bulked it up with citations from both the Associated Press and several, large-circulation publications from Oregon including The Oregonian and Willamette Week. I spent a goodly amount of time on this project as well.

Based on the show's clips, I feel that it's more than worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia, especially in light of the ever-growing number of articles on the site and the increasing minutia and localized focus of their content. I would be happy to revise the Cort and Fatboy page in whatever manner you see fit but I humbly request that you take another look at this case and the circumstances. Orange Mike, another admin, deleted the new page and requested that I consult you for further input. I would like to get the page reinstated, if at all possible. If you're still unconvinced of its worthiness, I'd be happy to send along a multitude of links to other locally-focused articles with even skimpier references that have managed to stick on Wikipedia without incident.

-Stumptowner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stumptowner (talk • contribs) 16:47, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because the original article was deleted after an AFD discussion, you need to go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and make your case there. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks Stumptowner (talk) 23:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Stumptowner[reply]

Freedom Spartans Athletic

Hi,

I have just seen the article I have written today has been deleted. On the talk page for the article I wrote asking for some basic feedback as to why it wasnt deemed suitable but instead the article was just removed. can u let me know why it was taken off as speed delete as other teams on our league have similar pages which are still in force and have been for some time. I also mentioned that if it was to do with the lack of referencing then this was only because i struggled to work out how to reference, even having gone through the wiki tutorial for it.

if u can let me know anyway would be most grateful as it took all day and would be really gutting if its just because im too basic to understand how to reference effectively!!Kingofthespartans (talk) 19:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for a swift response. I disagree and feel that this article does have a wider interest than the club notability spec that we don't currently enter a national cup. As things stand the club are the top goalscorers in the league and we could potentially be the first club to win this division in a maiden season. We are the only team from Aldershot permitted to play in the Guildford and Woking Alliance League. I also think that because of our status as a new club, this makes such an article of further public interest to see how a club develops from its absolute inception, which the article offers.Kingofthespartans (talk) 19:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DJ HOLLYGROVE deletion

I would appreciate if you didnt delete this top, i am currently working with another admin who is working with me to make sure this page stays up!! Thanx a mill... any questions or you wanna help out a fellow New Orleanian contact me mmarshall69@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnmac504 (talk • contribs) 23:30, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a prod tag rather than speedy deleting, but you need to find some reliable sources soon if you want the page to stay. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:45, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Preciate it ya heard me lol I been looking for stuff because I just couldnt believe this DJ who i have been following for a few years, someone who used to be Pretty Ricky DJ doesnt have a wiki! Then I saw it was deleted so I have been trying to get everything needed to keep it up!

Johnmac504 (talk) 24:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Would Itunes, or radio airplay(regionally not nationwide) count as a reliable source? Johnmac504 (talk) 24:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Nope. Again, please look at WP:V and WP:MUSIC. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent block

I was displeased at your way of handling the Pirroformayor2012 account. Are you aware of the WP:BITE clause. you should have just brought the matter up and suggested he rename his account. If he disregards your comment, then you block him. And before you start jumping to conclusions, I know you blocked him because I created his talk page and he is not a sock puppet of mines. Cheers. Jessy ^T^/^C 01:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The block was not just because of the username. He also posted a long campaign ad as an article. I typically will block accounts with advertising-type names only if they actually post an ad, which this user did. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:10, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my mistake I missed that perfectly reasonable block. Jessy ^T^/^C 01:12, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet harassment

It seems many accounts that appear to be sockpuppets of no one sockmaster constantly harass you on your talk page. There were at least 9 of them. In addition, many attack pages were directed at you. A possibility may be indefinite semi-protection for your actual talk page, while creating a subpage of the talk page to act as the real talk page that anyone can edit.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could we remove this for denying recognition? It's a banned user. Do we need this list? --Bsa dow ski1 04:42, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Replaced with count of them.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The only benefit of that would be that I wouldn't see as many annoying yellow boxes. The vandalism would still continue and still have to be dealt with by other admins. In my opinion, it's not worth the bother. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Money In the Blank

Why did you deprod? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 22:37, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't deprod, the article author did that. So I decided to AFD it to settle the thing. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover

Could you please make me a filemover. I have extensive experience with files and I am the number one person to make typos when making an upload, this is why I had to go to so many admins or filemovers to move these files. I would very much appreciate it. Cheers. Jessy ^T^/^C 00:14, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I just noticed you change my rights. Jessy ^T^/^C 00:42, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OneTravel Page Deletion

You've deleted this page several times.

OneTravel is a legitimate online travel agency with thousands of daily bookings, multiple awards, and a strong presence in the travel industry.

The page did not seem to violate any of Wiki's rules in regard to content. A previous question about content was met with only swift deletion. Please explain why the article was deleted and how the page can be improved in your eyes.

MikeTravels (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2011 (UTC)Michael[reply]

The page OneTravel was deleted after discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneTravel. Although I didn't participate in that discussion, it looks like the deletion was because OneTravel did not meet our notability guidelines for companies, see WP:CORP. If you want to pursue this further, you should go to Wikipedia:Deletion review and follow the instructions there. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:46, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boué Soeurs

I don't agree with the speedy deletion tagging or deletion of this. I was in the process of asking our copyright guru about it here when you deleted it - please see what I say there for my reasoning. Dpmuk (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied to User:Ellen Ada Goldberg/Boué Soeurs until this is sorted out. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to give you a bit more background. There are two main areas I work in on wikipedia, requested moves and copyright problems. I was watching this page after the move request out of interest to see what would happen to it. I ask Moonriddengirl's advice partly because I want to learn more about how to handle copyright problems and had pretty much written the message before you acted so still decide to ask the question for my education rather then to query your decision. Dpmuk (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

rticle about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject)

The hell does that mean? WE WORKED HARD ON THAT ARTICLE. ALL OUR WORK IS GONE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdgator29 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about your hard work, but articles about musicians need to show how they meet our notability requirements (see WP:MUSIC) as established in reliable independent sources (see WP:V). NawlinWiki (talk) 21:10, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey this is need7 but dude you deleted Bob Nugeaneas Hes the marketing head for my company so please put back my page

That's funny, in the two previous versions, you said he was a fictional character. No more pages about your friends, co-workers, relatives, or characters you made up, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:38, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He is not real, but a person he is the face of my company Like The wendys girl, and you also deleted Jacob Lee And that happens to be me im jacob foster lee so can you not delete me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Need7 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. Read WP:N, WP:V, and WP:NFT, please. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

can i have my pages back please in a email atleast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Need7 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting user with potentially disruptive username

The user Silberfuchs in my opinion has a very inappropriate username. Jessy ^T^/^C 02:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? This user account doesn't seem to exist.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:19, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The user has been given a username violation warning.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The username is a reference to Operation Silver Fox. See the German word for it. --Bsa dow ski1 02:22, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami is semi-protected

I noticed you semi-protected Talk:2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. I've asked Wikipedia talk:Protection policy#Semi-protecting article talk pages for clarification about the appropriateness of that action. Thank you. 68.165.77.24 (talk) 10:26, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, could you please unprotect the talk page? Currently IPs and non-autoconfirmed users can't join discussion or make edit requests, etc. Thank you! — Bility (talk) 22:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The protection policy states that semi protection may be appropriate, and since the talk page has been hit by a vandalism wave not combatable otherwise, NawlinWiki's protection of the talk page has my personal support. However, the protection shouldn't be kept for any longer than necessary. Zakhalesh (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And has been lifted already, I see. Have a nice day everyone! Zakhalesh (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User with a copyright problem

User:Irfanpuniali has created two copvio articles today 1, 2 (currently CSD'd), one after being warned. In just the last week, the editor has been warned for copyright problems as well. I wanted to post this at ANI but I saw you were active at CSD and figured to notify you.--NortyNort (Holla) 12:19, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Idiot

You should give an article time to build! It is not against a policy it does not fall under G11. just turn your ego down a bit, your the president of Wikipedia. --Arie Scheurwater ^{(User Page | Talk | Global Contribs)} 05:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Our products are well known"? "At the cutting edge"? That's advertising. And watch the personal attacks. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree personal attacks are a dangerous thing on Wikipedia. I think i should do something about it. I am going start the WBI (Wikipedia Bureau of Investigation). YAY!!! Who wants to become a cop? I am your chief - in - charge of the WBI. wOHOHHOHOH --Arie Scheurwater ^{(User Page | Talk | Global Contribs)} 19:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Original Content

Reference: (2:18, 28 March 2011 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Online Deals Industry" ‎ (A10: Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic: Online shopping) Online Deals industry is different from that of Online shopping on the following grounds:

1 Online shopping is about websites that offers one to shop online, where as in Online Deals Industry, a website may or may not allow the user to shop online and the primary focus here is the deal information or the deal itself.
1 Online Deals Industry is a much recent phenomena; though there were random occurrences here and there, but since the past couple of years, this has become an industry of its own.
3 The information required to understand the two is varied, though there might be certain overlap in a few areas.

However, since you have observed certain duplications, kindly let me know the areas of duplication so that the article can be altered accordingly and am able to justify the topic. Please support.--Francis Gonsalves (talk) 11:09, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- It seems to me that deal websites are a subset of online shopping - perhaps you could add a paragraph or two to Online shopping if needed. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can only assume that this is one of our regular customers trying to pass himself off as a sock of "Francis Gonsalves", who made the comment just above, so Gonzales now sleeps with the fishes. Favonian (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, thanks Favonian! NawlinWiki (talk) 13:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No explanation of the subject's significance

Hi Nawlin, I’m new in Wikipedia, and I don´t understand why my article was deleted.(“Furia World”). It is about one of the biggest and most important advertising agencies in Latin America, and very important worldwide. It is an agency that sets global trend. I think the article is a small contribution to the advertising students. Perhaps I should talk more about their famous campaigns. How I can fix it to avoid being eliminated? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agustinlampe (talk • contribs) 20:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You need to cite reliable independent sources that discuss this company and show that it meets the notability requirements of WP:CORP. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Sean Donnelly (rapper)

Hi, I see you have deleted the Sean Donnelly/Andrew Lansley Rap page.

It seems a little precipitous to me. Sean Donnelly and/or the rap have been featured by both the BBC and the Guardian in the space of a couple of days, and it's pretty obvious that there is going to be quite a bit more where that came from.

Another editor had intended to rename the page, so that it highlighted the track itself rather than its author; in hindsight this might have been the better approach from the outset.

It may well be that within a few weeks this particular phenomenon may have sunk below the waterline of notability, but that seems rather unlikely now.

At any rate, deleting the article after just a few hours seems to be rather hasty.DanieleProcida (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aghada

I have provided reliable sources in the discussion page xxxxxx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sword Of Aghada (talk • contribs) 11:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC) Thats simply untrue you have no proof what so ever. But it says something about your life if you have seen this hundreds of times. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sword Of Aghada (talk • contribs) 11:59, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Justianopolis redirect

I created a redirect from Justianopolis to the Chebba article, as it appears from a reliable source that when the town was created it was called Justianopolis. See Chebba#History. You deleted it saying "Article that has no meaningful, substantive content". But is was a redirect, they have no content. Did I make a mistake in formatting the redirect? --Bejnar (talk) 21:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - it wasn't a redirect - it was just the word "Chebba". Just try it again. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My error. I also misspelled Justinianopolis. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 22:00, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Kid Ink

I created the article for Kid Ink. I looked over the criteria for a musician's article to be significant, and Kid Ink fit rule 14. His song Lowkey Poppin was played on a national radio station. Plus he has worked with grammy award winning artists Chris Brown & Diddy. Please reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhunt999 (talk • contribs) 12:32, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article didn't say anything about the song being played on national radio. You would need to cite a reliable independent source to show that. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Furia World

Hi Nawlin,Sorry to bother you again, but I ´am trying to learn s and the process is hard. You told me that the sources were ads created by Furia, but they are interviews published by prestigious journals. Do I have to cite articles that aren´t interviews? Thank you for the time I aprecite it. Agustinlampe (talk) 17:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]