User talk:NavyaDesai98

Welcome!

Hello, NavyaDesai98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

- Frood (talk!) 04:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello NavyaDesai98. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:NavyaDesai98. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=NavyaDesai98|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. - Frood (talk!) 04:30, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Frood for the guidance. The articles which I have created or edited are not PAID ones. But, yes I do study in the same university whose journal page I have recently created. Does it qualify for conflict of interest (COI)? Kindly advise. -NavyaDesai98 (talk) 04:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should be okay in that case. Just be mindful to try to stay neutral, and you'll be in good shape! - Frood (talk!) 05:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once again Frood. From now onwards, I will stick to regular AFC route. - NavyaDesai98 (talk) 05:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Liberal Studies (Journal)

The article Liberal Studies (Journal) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable and apparently moribund journal, only 4 issues published in 2016/2017. No indication of any notability. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 12:01, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: GRUH Finance has been accepted

GRUH Finance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:45, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:24, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]