User talk:Navidfa

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Submission (Submission to God) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Atif.t2 (talk) 00:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Math miracle of Quran

A tag has been placed on Math miracle of Quran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Basmalah2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Basmalah2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Basmalah2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Basmalah2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 04:41, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Quran code does not have an edit summary. In addition, (1) please do not use HTML mark up such as paragraph breaks - they are not necessary. (2) We use sentence case for headings and keep them as short as possible per WP:MOSHEAD.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! ukexpat (talk) 12:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quran code

The article contains very little in the way of reliable sources. The claims of the creator of the theory aren't considered reliable. Is there coverage in news sources? Have the claims been looked at by acknowledged academics? You may also wish to read this: Wikipedia:Truth. Thanks! - Richfife (talk) 20:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rich. I am new at editing at wikipedia so I am not totally familiar with the best way forward. I provided several news sources from different countries regarding this matter throughout the last several decades up to the present. Please advise me on what else would be needed.- Navidfa (talk) 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quran code for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quran code is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran code until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.