User talk:Nautilyus

Dear Nautilyus,

I have reverted your edits on the Mustafa Hijri article as they didn't follow the standard procedure of article deletion, cf. WP:PROD. However, on your behalf, I have proposed this article for deletion.

Xionbox^₪ 09:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mohammad Seddigh Kaboudvand, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mohammad Seddigh Kaboudvand was changed by Nautilyus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961031 on 2011-03-23T08:52:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

prod tags

A reason is supposed to be given in the tag, just the edit summary. But in any case I think most of the Kurdish politicians, writers, and musicians you have tagged are probably notable, and it can not be expected that deletions in this field will be uncontested. I've removed the prods, If you want to take them to AfD, be prepared to present a clear concise argument. and be aware of WP:BEFORE -- First look for additional sources, & if not found, only then nominate for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:40, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Couple of things

I've declined your speedy deletion request of Mustafa Hijri as there has been more than one editor involved over quite some time. Secondly, can I ask you to use the edit summaries? It makes life much easier for someone trying to find out what happened when, as in the case of your attempted listing of Mustafa Hijri which doesn't seem to have worked. I'm still looking into it, and would ask you not to blank the page again. Peridon (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Peridon asked for help with this at AN/I here. I've removed the PROD from the page, as deletion seems at least slightly controversial, and completed the AfD nomination with your PROD statement. Please continue the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mustafa Hijri and do not continue to blank the article or add speedy tags to it. Cheers. lifebaka++ 14:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Another thing

You are clearly the same person who uses the User:Aschillez account. Please stick to one account per WP:SOCK. If you do not do so then you are likely to find yourself blocked from editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Please read wiki guidelines

Hi, Please read about style. I do spend sometime to create readable good articles in wiki and see you and make such edits. What is the value of this? you have not followed the style which is using "harv style" but you come and put a random google book source. Please discuss things in talk page and spend sometime to put the materials with care.Xashaiar (talk) 10:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Rhages/Rey

That's fine. What we shouldn't do is suggest somehow that the city of Rhages still exists, which unfortunately the Ray, Iran article does by confusing the mound and the modern city. Dougweller (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

One thing: is it fair that you, Nautilyus, disregard the style of the page and add your stuff without any effort in using relevant citation templates? Xashaiar (talk) 16:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Citation templates

I see you are still ignoring the plea to cite properly. Editors should not have to look at a link to figure out what it is. Follow the standard already used in the article, please. And travel books do not meet our criteria at WP:RS for this article. Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 11:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Apparent lack of interest in communicating with other editors

You are continuing to ignore comments here (and in edit summaries). Wikipedia is a project that requires editors to work together and this includes talking to each other. You don't seem willing to do this, and in particular continue to add raw links as references despite two of asking you not. If you don't start fixing your citations so that readers can see what they are without clicking on them, and if you don't start discussing on talk pages, I'll start a discussion on ANI. I don't mean to sound rough, but you aren't helping readers by adding raw urls with no information about the source. There are templates above the edit window I'm typing in that help you do this. Dougweller (talk) 14:34, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 12:13, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocking

You have started to edit again without communicating. I will block you if you continue to refuse to communicate. I don't understand why you also refuse to follow our citation standards. Dougweller (talk) 08:45, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nautilyus for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)