User talk:Naturebunny1

Welcome!

Hello, Naturebunny1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 23:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lyndeboro Town Seal

So I guess we have one of two options (or more?)... Leave the 'seal' that's on the Lyndeborough, NH page and explain somewhere its origins, or get an image of the real seal. Thoughts? And by the way - welcome to Wikipedia :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I will talk to the town clerk and see if I can get a copy of the "official" town seal--hopefully this week, but more than likely not until sometime around mid-January '07. In the meantime I like the idea of leaving the unofficial town seal with its origins--perhaps the two seals can coexist. I will also try to get the detailed origins of the original seal to you--I think the person who designed it as a 5th or 6th grader in the 1970s still lives in town.

By the way, you've done an incredible job of collecting municipal seals from around New Hampshire! Naturebunny1 05:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awww shucks! :) I think I've managed to add about 5 or so, and I've sorta stalled in adding more. When you visit the town clerk, see if they know if there's a state collection of town seals. I'll be heading to our town clerk in early Jan, so I'll try to remember to ask the same thing. BTW, there's a link under the seal itself (it says Seal) that links to a (non-existent) page that's there to describe and/or add the history of the seal. If we get the "real" seal, I think we should make that page with the history of both it and the one created by the kid. That would be cool :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I got a copy of the town seal from the Town Clerk, but promptly gave it up when I suggested to the town adminstrator that the selectmen consider a new town seal that uses the unofficial seal as its basis. I'll let you know if there's any movement on it, and I'll try again to get a copy of the official seal. User:Naturebunny1 19:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!!!! Teach you to speak up :) That's kewl - I'll keep a watch here to see what's going on :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 20:05, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Naturebunny1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Naturebunny1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gill Stadium

Thanks for your addition! That is usually treated as a single reference, and there is a template to put the page number in the text, so I've post-edited you; also removed the template at the top that said there are no references. Spike-from-NH (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS--Have now post-edited you at Varick Park and Beech Street Grounds too, the same conversion plus a tiny bit of copy-editing. It is baffling having these three pages about the same site, using the same reference, each including somewhat different information. Perhaps all the information should be in Gill Stadium, with its previous phases as section headings, and the other two pages should simply redirect to that page. Spike-from-NH (talk) 03:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you—and I agree, the Beech Street Grounds/Varick Park pages logically should be rolled into the Gill Stadium page. They aren’t well known on their own and these pages probably don’t generate much interest except among people who visit the Gill Stadium page first. Naturebunny1 (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on this. Separately, I've been post-edited by a 'bot on one of the three pages whose Edit Summary says that it's now policy to use {{ISBN}} rather than "ISBN" (which used to be a Magic Word to the software to automatically generate links, but isn't anymore). The 'bot hasn't found the other two pages. Spike-from-NH (talk) 14:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is done, and I have called for someone knowledgeable to turn the other two pages into redirects. I know how to do this, but don't know what to do with categories such as "Defunct" that don't apply to Gill Stadium. Please reread and fix any mistakes that have snuck in! Spike-from-NH (talk) 15:55, 16:08, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great—I see no factual (or other) issues. By combining those pages and making other organizational changes in the way that you did, the entry reads much better now. Thank you for all of your work on this. Naturebunny1 (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Naturebunny1. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]