User talk:Naturallyblind

If you want to practice edit please use the sandbox. As t is you appear to be a single purpose attack account. Please do not revert again.Allknowingallseeing (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what in the world are you talkign about? i didnt attack Kim Basinger, i just put back a bad review, for balance. Naturallyblind (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLease tell me that you would like me to believe that you just woke up one day, joined Wikipedia and picked this article to edit out of a clear blue sky. I need a laugh. You obviously know Wiki Etiquette well and you are an attack account. PLease stop reverting. 3RR and all that Allknowingallseeing (talk) 20:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't you edit WP for a while before you created your account? I'm no expert, but i think to be using an "attack" account, i'd need to actually attack someone. Feel free to report me to an admin if I have, but last I checked refering to a bad movie review wasn't an attack. Naturallyblind (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could both of you please not attack each other over an edit and try to edit in a collaborative fashion while discussing things reasonably? There is people trying to work here. --Enric Naval (talk) 21:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eric, asking a single purpose attack account to cease is not an attack. So please don't address me thusly again.Allknowingallseeing (talk) 22:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Films talk

Just to be sure, you caught who the actual account holder is, right? Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Clearly somebody in hollywoodland needs a hug. Naturallyblind (talk) 02:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. You're a better man that I am, Gunga Din. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI, the account was blocked as a sockpuppet. This does not mean, however, he won't be back. Just watch for a new account with the same agenda. Wildhartlivie (talk) 18:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm aware of all of that. I don't think anyone has ever been able to prove anything definitively, although it is a case of "yeah, we do know that". I don't think I'd aggravate it, though, by confronting him/her about it. While the "I'll get an adminstrator to block you" thing was excessive, there are some ties there to some higher up persons here, and it won't help to fix anything. It's a relationship that has been there a long time and he/she doesn't really go much over the line in the defense of or assist of the sock unless he/she actually agrees. I've dealt with this before, attempts were made to out me, although they were off-base on their findings. Edit in good cheer and don't dwell on this. It'll make you nuts! Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don Murphy hounding

So, If you are against Don Murphy, they welcome you with open arms in Wikipedia? 90% of the articles edited by Naturallyblind are related to DM work. This account must be stopped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.130.144.4 (talk) 03:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Morrow

Many thanks for sorting out the photo on the above. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 08:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]