User talk:NativeForeigner/Archive/Archive-Feb2007

State highways in Oregon

Thanks for the comment. I'm trying to follow the format for the Oregon highways Wikiproject. As you suggested, I've been putting a watch on my new pages.Dan ad nauseam 04:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VP

Of course it is up to the moderators to decide the fate of your application, but they likely will reject it, because you have done only 198 mainspace edits, and the required minimum is 250 ;-). Happy Editing by Snowolf^TALK on 13:48, 27 January 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Your VandalProof Application

Dear Redskunk,

Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under main here). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof. Prodego ^talk 03:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Prodego ^talk 03:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace edits are edits to articles. Prodego ^talk 03:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the edit is deleted, it is not counted. Since new page patrol consists of tagging articles for deletion, the edits made are later deleted along with the page. Prodego ^talk 03:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TY RED skunk^{^TALK}

Thanks

Thanks for the award, it's really apprecicated!!Telly addict^{Editor review!} 10:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Sig

Hi Redskunk. I noticed that Wikipedia:Bot Requests you posted using a transcluded sig, {{User:Redskunk/Signature}}. Per Wikipedia:Signatures, this is frowned upon. I would recommend that you subst all transclusions and stop making comments using that template. Thanks. ST47Talk 00:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, peer review, and project-wide collaboration.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 03:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aero-specs tag

The {{aero-specs}} tag should be used when most or all of the specs are missing, or on more important aircraft when some of the minor specs are missing that should be available. It can be removed when they're added. 'Fraid I don't know about AWB. - Aerobird ^{Target locked - Fox One!} 15:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hey

Hi Redskunk, thanks for the wikibirthday banner - I haven't been around this passed month due to problems irl, but now I'm back from my wikibreak ^_^ Hope you've been wacking extra amounts of vandals in my absence! ShakingSpirit ^talk 18:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]