User talk:Natieboi

Maps

If you look at maps all day long, I hope you try the online game "Worldle". https://worldle.teuteuf.fr/ Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 19:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I always have seen you tubers play that game and it was pretty fun playing it, thank you! Natieboi (talk) 14:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please see WP:NOBAN that says "In general, one should avoid substantially editing another's user and user talk pages, except when it is likely edits are expected and/or will be helpful." In this edit you changed the editors comment to something unlikely to be expected or considered helpful. I suggest that you self-revert that edit. Sjö (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

got it, my apologies, thanks

Natieboi (talk) 10:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replies to your question at the Teahouse

Hello, Natieboi. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 20:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Süleyman Uluçay (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are two sources with unknown reliability. There isn't any credibility for this person. Please add more reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Süleyman Uluçay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 18:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OnlyNano! i just have a question if you don't mind, i'll try to be adding more sources to the page, but I don't see how the two sources are unreliable, the first one is from the towns municipality itself, and for the second one, i've seen many articles (cypriot villages) that uses the website as a reliable source, (ex: prastio, Peristerona, Polis, Skylloura, Louroujina, Nisou, Menogeia, Agios Andronikos, etc......)

this is my first article i've ever tried to write, i'm still learning. so thank you! Natieboi (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Natieboi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OnlyNano^talk 18:26, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]