User talk:Nathanael Bar-Aur L./Uncivil posts

MESSAGE CONCERNING YOUR CLAIMS

Hello Mr Nathanael
Concerning your claims about Astrological sites and not only...

1) Astrology-Online.com [1] is one the biggest Astrological sites in the internet with many known Astrologists in there (and not only one astrologer)...SO IT IS A VERY RELIABLE SOURCE ACTUALLY...also their material is already in use in many other pages here in Wikipedia by others as well.

If you have personal objections about Astrology-online.com or for any other site i want to see PROOF of why they are not reliable sites as you claim. Υου know that SLANDER is a crime right?(it is a question ? and not a threat)

2) If you want to contribute material from Linda Goodman i do not have a problem with that BUT please also add Wikipedia notes (Inline citations) with the exact page numbers and copies of her material so everyone can clearly see her claims...

Avoid making generalisations and by the way misinterpetations of the sources are not acceptable and i will report them to the Administrator.

3) There was a clear misinterpetation of the sources (probably by purpose...) mostly in the traits section of the Aquarius wikipage [2] there was also already a warning about that in the start of that page if you had not notice...

MY EDIT WAS CORRECT if you want to add anything do that after my edit with the necessary citations (and inline citations with electronic and print references to be more believable...) and without violating the Npov. Do not try to Undo all the page again as my citations are clear in there...

4) Wikipedia is open for all people to contribute, it is not only for you. You are not making the rules in here and you are not an administrator or a judge to tell the other people of what is right and what is wrong and especially according to your own personal beliefs. Linda Goodman materials are not the only reliable source in the world there are many reliable sources out there and way older to educate yourself about Astrology. Goodman did not created Astrology after all but others centuries before her (http://astrologysigns-insider.com/astrology-signs/the-history-behind-ancient-greek-astrology).

By the way if you have any personal objections you can make them in the discussion pages and not in the history pages...
Thank you. --SotosfromGreece (talk) 14:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

I shall answer this in the Scorpio talk page. --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

You have been reported for Vandalism

Mr Nathanael you have been reported to the Administrators page for Vandalism. TheAstrologer.com - Kelli Fox is a professional astrologer as i clearly state and told you and she has accreditations from the following astrological organizations: CA NCGR, PMAFA, ISAR C.A.P., FAA you can find more about her in her homepage http://theastrologer.com/ It does not matter if she is not "famous enough" according to your own personal opinion...

TheAstrologer.com is a fully reliable source and is based on a Professional Astrologer. Your latest action by trying to delete my source was unjustified. Just because YOU disagree for your own personal reasons (example: not being famous...) does not give you the right to delete other peoples reliable sources...
If you do this again i will report you again. Thank you. --SotosfromGreece (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Why are you so biased ?

Answer...

kashimjamed (talk) 22:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia requires factual claims to be backed up by reliable sources. Non-factual claims (opinions) are to be attributed to leading figures in the field. That is the simple formula here. I don't care what claims are made, just that they fit in with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --Nathanael Bar-Aur L. (talk) 07:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

You remove almost everything that's good about Scorpio and add fake stuff on Taurus. kashimjamed (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Lol, if your telling me to go to the Nuetral POV, why don't YOU do it first? Because obviously the things said on Taurus's Physical Traits are OPINIONS. There's some goodlookings Taurus and UGLY looking ones, too, so you can't say that they ALL are goodlooking. It's a matter of opinion. PLEASE stop being a hypocrite.

kashimjamed (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Stop

Please STOP and read the Neutral POV. If you continue and revert my edits in Taurus, I'll report you to an administrator.

kashimjamed (talk) 15:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

2nd Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. STOP removing stuff from Scorpio because you are just jealous that it is cited properly. If you continue, I'll report for vandalism and put you on the Notice Board for Neutral Point of View.

kashimjamed (talk) 14:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.