User talk:NatalieAnise

Welcome!

Hello, NatalieAnise, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

R. Couri Hay

Your new article does not cite any references. As a biography of a living person this is especially problematic and could be a cause for deleting the article. Please try to add sources to the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please let me know which sources are not eligible, and or anything else that is leading my page towards deletion? The page is R. Couri Hay.

Your article appears quite healthy at the moment. No worries. However, I did note that there were two contributions from Nataliecpr (talk · contribs). That's not you under a different name, is it? With few exceptions, that's against the rules. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great to hear my article looks fine. How do I delete the previous account, nataliecpr? I went ahead and changed the affiliated email so both accounts do not have the same emails.

You actually can't delete the unused account. It can be renamed; it can be disappeared, but it can't actually be deleted. I would recommend that you post a "help me" request on User talk:Nataliecpr, and explain that you created the new account by mistake, but that you intend to abandon it in favor of this account. Using two accounts maliciously is against the rules, but the admins are quite forgiving of simple mistakes such as this. They may block the Nataliecpr account so that it can't be used for editing again, but I doubt they will take any actions against this account. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Shafiroff

I just became aware of my latest Wikipedia page for Jean Shafiroff. Her last name is not capitalized, "shafiroff." What are my options to make this edit? NatalieAnise (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Evanh2008. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Evanh2008 ^{(talk|contribs)} 22:42, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article Jean Shafiroff

Hello. I see that you've blanked the article, apparently with the intention of deleting the article. However, please be noted that deleting the article is not tantamount to deletion, and that if you wish to fundamentally rewrite the article, you are free to work on it in the main article space or, more preferably, the WP:SANBOX. Now, the article looks like it was tagged with WP:PROD for an uncontroversial deletion. If you believe that the page is indeed due for deletion, then you can just let the PROD stay for a week, then the article will be reviewed and possibly deleted by an administrator. If you believe that the article should be kept, then you can remove the PROD tag without further comments, as PROD is for uncontroversial deletions and a single objection can fail the proposal. You can make improvements and additions any time. If you have any questions or comments, please leave a message on my talk page. KJ^{«Click Here»} 22:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jean Shafiroff, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. It does not matter what the subject would like public, if reported in RSs. Epeefleche (talk) 17:15, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NatalieAnise. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jean Shafiroff, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. As here. Epeefleche (talk) 17:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

This edit was unhelpful. It has been reverted by another editor. The reference was fine, as it was. Your change led to the footnote not displaying properly. Please do not "save" your edits until you have checked their effect. And please do not make edits such as this one, that mar the article rather than improve it. Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Can you please give guidance on the removal of some information that is slander and harming to the Shafiroff family? ([User talk:NatalieAnise|talk]])

There is no slander. Thus, you should not be removing it.

Have you read the above notes to you about conflict of interest? Have you read as well the notes about improper removal of proper text? Please read those. If you are working for a PR company, especially, please take the conflict of interest message to you to heart. The same if you know the subjects of the articles that you are editing.

Wikipedia is not a forum for the subject of the article to use as advertising or PR for themselves, deleting whatever they would choose to delete if they wrote the article themselves, or through their PR agency. If they think that is the case, they are mistaken. Wikipedia reflects what the RSs report. If Ms. Shafiroff wishes to conceal that she was born in Long Island, or that her maiden name was Lutri, or that she attended Holy Trinity High School, this is not a forum for an exercise in Stalinistic removal of such information, if it was (as here) reported in reliable sources. Thanks. --Epeefleche (talk) 17:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I apologize for utilizing the word slander as the information about Jean's family is true. I have taken note that Jean's Wikipedia page is a primary source on information and perhaps the first thing many may read about her. Some information was concerning and I am sure many hate putting their family at risk with such available details. Your work is great however. Looking forward to reading your other pages you created.

Thanks for your note on slander. As to the information on Jean -- everything in the article that she wants to take out what already reported by the media, and is already out there for anyone to see -- if they have a computer and have heard of google. The fact that she was born on Long Island, or that her maiden name was Lutri, or that she went to Holy Trinity for high school ... all material you said she wanted deleted ... do not strike me as items that put anyone at all at risk. And it's not as though she is someone who is notable for a ponzi scheme or the like ... but even the facts on Bernie Madoff's place of birth and schools and the like are reflected, so that's not a reason to delete either. Best. Epeefleche (talk) 02:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Thank you for taking the time to explain the wikipedia policies to me. I now have a clearer understanding of the sites guidelines. I understand and accept your position regarding Jean Shafiroff's profile. I will not be suggesting any more changes to this Wikipedia page in the future. Thank you very much. ([User talk:NatalieAnise|talk]])

File permission problem with File:New York (Magazine) Cover, August 6, 1979.png

Thanks for uploading File:New York (Magazine) Cover, August 6, 1979.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

edit

Thank you for the note. I have added {{OTRS pending}} to the image description. The image was given the note that "copyright expired because the work was published without a copyright notice and/or without the necessary copyright registration." I can try and provide the email from New York Magazine that confirms this information. Please confirm that this is the correct step. Thank you NatalieAnise (talk)

edit

Hello Stefan2 (talk). Please be advised that an email granting permission was sent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Please continue to be in communication when this item is approved. Thanks NatalieAnise (talk)