User talk:Nashwalker

September 2013

Hello, I'm Minna Sora no Shita. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of Sofia the First episodes without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! (removed copyvio tag without permission) --みんな空の下 (トーク) 05:42, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with List of Sofia the First episodes. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:List of Sofia the First episodes/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 16:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nash Bridges, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Perry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in K.C. Undercover, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I encourage you to look at the MOS:BOLD guideline, as I reverted edits concerning your adding boldface to character names in the above article, as well as for I Didn't Do It (TV series). Guideline is clear on the appropriate uses for boldface. MPFitz1968 (talk) 06:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Your addition to List of ChalkZone episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Episode summaries must be written from scratch in our own words. They may not be copied or even closely paraphrased from other sources. The community takes copyright violations seriously. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rush Hour (U.S. TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of State Security. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Unforgettable (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Unforgettable Season 3.png

Thanks for uploading File:Unforgettable Season 3.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Twister (1996 film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 00:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Scooby-Doo on Zombie Island have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 15:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nashwalker. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Rugrats Movie plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NinjaRobotPirate (talk • contribs) 06:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at Holes (film). You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to talk page

You are invited to the talk page on WP:FILM to discuss the issues with the format of 2019 in film. BattleshipMan (talk) 01:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Five Heartbeats. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 07:14, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. I'm leaving this here instead of making a new section because it's related to the message Doniago left you last month. While I was working through a backlog of plot summaries in film articles I've been meaning to fix up, I came across John Q. When I checked into the article history, as I always do, I realized that much of the plot bloat there came directly from your efforts over several years and that you've been reverted and warned about this multiple times since at least 2014. It's obvious you have a passion for films and that, like me, you enjoy working on the plot sections. I wanted to direct you, again, to the plot section of the film project's style guidelines so you can get a better idea of when that kind of length is needed in an article and what the goal of the plot summary is within the larger scope of WIkipedia at large. Millahnna (talk) 02:31, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nashwalker, the time for you to respond to other editors' concerns came a long time ago: you cannot simply ignore this. I see editors signaled problems with your plot additions years ago, and they have a point. The long and short of it is that if you a. continue to edit in the same vein, bloating plot summaries, and b. refuse to learn from and communicate with other editors, you will end up being blocked for disruptive editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 - plots

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:42, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Absentia (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoff Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Animal Crackers (2017 film). WP:FILMPLOT again. Stop it. Binksternet (talk) 02:51, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nash, I took the plot summary you last added at Animal Crackers and cut it down to under 700 words. I'm not familiar with the film, but there were a lot of details and linguistic fluff, cliches, etc. that seemed unnecessary to me. Our goal is to provide a general overview of the plot, not replace the experience of seeing it. Sometimes it can be difficult to find the right details to omit, but with practice it can get easier. I didn't look at the version that existed before yours, so my changes aren't based on a preconceived opinion. My version is as follows:

Extended content

Brothers Bob and Horatio Huntington run a circus. Their gypsy partner Esmerelda introduces them to her niece Talia. Both brothers are smitten, but Talia chooses Bob and they get engaged. Horatio feels betrayed. On the couple's wedding day, Esmerelda gives them a mysterious box, allowing them to open a circus full of magical animals who perform amazing stunts.

Years later, Bob's nephew Owen falls in love with a girl, Zoe. They grow up, and Owen proposes to her. Her father Mr. Woodley persuades Owen to prove himself worthy of his daughter, so Owen takes a job at Woodley's dog biscuit factory as a taste tester. Horatio, now washed-up, sneaks into Bob's circus at night, trying to learn where the magic animals come from. One night, circus animals Old Blue and Zena discover him, and in the ensuing scuffle, a fire starts and Bob and Talia die. Horatio crashes their memorial service and declares that he is taking over the circus as retribution for Bob choosing Talia. He and his henchmen attack the performers, causing Owen and his family to flee.

Old Blue and Zena give Owen and Zoe the magic box. Owen discovers that the box holds animal crackers and inadvertently eats one of them, turning into a guinea pig. Clown Chesterfield explains that the cookies turn people into the animal they eat, and it is full of unlimited animal cookies, but there is only one human cookie for each person to return to normal. The Huntingtons learn they've inherited the circus. Zoe is excited and quits her factory job and restarts the circus, but Owen still wants to prove himself to Woodley, so he keeps working at the factory. Woodley, angered over his daughter's departure, considers another employee, egotistical Brock, to become his successor.

Zoe persuades Owen to attend the re-opening of the magic animal circus, but it is a disaster because the audience is upset with the lack of animals. Owen is reluctant to become a performer, but changes his mind, and comes to enjoy performing. He quits his factory job, but as he packs up his office, Brock takes the animal cracker box, eats one of the cookies and turns into a mandrill. To catch up with Brock, Owen turns into a lion, but Brock falls out of a window, where one of Horatio's henchman briefly takes the box before Owen appears and scares him off.

At home, Owen discovers he has lost his human cookie, leaving him permanently trapped in animal form. Zoe struggles to accept this, but hopes that Owen can adjust to life as an animal. Meanwhile, Woodley's employee Binkley, who has been trying to come up with a new type of dog biscuit, discovers the magic cookies, and persuades Woodley to visit the circus to see his family.

Weeks pass and Owen is unable to find a suitable animal form. His relationship with his family suffers. One night, Horatio arrives with Owen's human cookie, offering to turn him back to normal as long as he turns the circus over to him. Owen refuses, deciding to remain an animal for as long as it keeps his family together. Horatio's henchmen are now animal hybrids after eating broken cookie pieces. They intimidate Owen into accepting the deal.

The circus performers unite to battle the henchmen and recover the box. Horatio eats the remaining broken cookies he has and turns himself into a chimera. Old Blue and Zena reveal themselves to be Bob and Talia; they escaped the fire, but their human cookies were destroyed, so they can never be human again. They plead with Horatio to redeem himself. Horatio refuses, and flies off with them. Owen's family works together to save Bob and Talia and capture Horatio and his henchmen. Owen turns Horatio into a hamster as punishment. Woodley, who saw the battle, reevaluates his views on the circus and accepts Owen and Zoe working there. He and Binkley rework the failed dog biscuit experiments into a new circus souvenir: animal crackers that temporarily turn the eater's skin into animal patterns. The Huntingtons and their friends continue to run the circus, with Owen debuting a new transformation: a dragon.

I'm not saying it's perfect, and I got lost in the area where Brock falls out a window. But hopefully you'll see the kinds of things that are easily cut when we focus. Some examples:

"a now-unsuccessful and washed-up Horatio" is wordy. "Horatio, now washed-up" is shorter and not repetitive, since "washed-up" typically means unsuccessful.
"He and his henchmen instigate a brawl with the performers" can be shortened to "He and his henchmen attack the performers" or "fight the performers".
"Owen is at first reluctant to take action, acknowledging he is not a performer, but is persuaded by Mackenzie, the other performers, and the dying audience." I shortened this to "Owen is reluctant to become a performer, but changes his mind, and comes to enjoy performing", since the details aren't as important as the character arc. It saves about 10 words and could possibly be even shorter. These changes add up.

I hope you don't take my notes as hostile criticism, I'm trying to help by giving you some constructive examples. And just so you know, the community typically doesn't care for user pages that target irritation at other editors, so I hope you'll maybe take a look at our userpage guidelines and please consider scaling back some of the upset. Nobody hates you, and that's why I took some time to edit down an alternative that observes your contributions, but that still adheres to community guidelines. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nashwalker, at The Color Purple (film) you added more plot text even though the plot section was already too large. Why did you do that? You must choose an online word counter tool, of which there are several. With the tool, you must check on the plot size before you add to it, and you can see whether the plot needs some wordiness removed so that your intended addition will fit. Binksternet (talk) 04:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martial Law (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Wright.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Flash (2014 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Klein.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Law & Order: Special Victims Unit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chester Lake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to The Matrix Resurrections, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 09:54, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You added more to an already bloated plot at The Search for Santa Paws also. I also note that almost all of your edits are unexplained, and that you still have not bothered to respond to any of your fellow editors' messages on your talk page. And in your entire Wikipedia career, you have made only two edits to article talk pages, though many of your edits have been reverted. This lack of communication on a collaborative project is as disruptive as your lack of interest in abiding by our guidelines. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:23, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pretty Hard Cases, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Bass.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Law & Order, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 03:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! So Why 11:45, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Walker, Texas Ranger episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Hudson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]