User talk:Naruto running

Welcome!

Hi Naruto running! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! --Malerooster (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Andre🚐 19:25, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Andre🚐 20:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have suggested a specific improvement which would improve the veracity of the articles in question. You and other users are the ones talking in circles and turning it into a general discussion. Naruto running (talk) 21:13, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Why did he pressure Shokin out?"

Because the U.S. and international community were concerned about corruption in Ukraine, and Shokin was not doing his job. That was public knowledge, so Joe Biden fixed the problem by pressuring the Ukrainian government into getting rid of Shokin and replacing him with a prosecutor who would really clean things up. All this was done very publicly. If Hunter Biden was acting corruptly/illegally, these actions by his father placed him in more jeopardy.

These were the effects of Joe Biden's actions. You don't need to read his mind. Just look at the effects of his actions. They resulted in positive changes in the fight against corruption in Ukraine. Now stop pushing your line of thinking. It will only get you blocked. Don't be an WP:SPA. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You asked that question, even though Shokin's article clearly states:

"Obama administration officials, European diplomats, and anti-corruption advocates in Ukraine say Shokin was removed because he failed to pursue Ukrainian politicians for corruption, and that they intervened before Biden did.^[1]^[2]^[3]"

Don't misuse the talk page when the answer is already provided in the article. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Subramanian, Courtney (15 November 2019) [Originally published 3 October 2019]. "Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases". USA Today. Retrieved 10 June 2023.
^ Cite error: The named reference FT-Envoys was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
^ Cite error: The named reference blake2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

August 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 02:38, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Subramanian, Courtney (15 November 2019) [Originally published 3 October 2019]. "Explainer: Biden, allies pushed out Ukrainian prosecutor because he didn't pursue corruption cases". USA Today. Retrieved 10 June 2023.

[FT-Envoys-2] Cite error: The named reference FT-Envoys was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[blake2020-3] Cite error: The named reference blake2020 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

[1]

[2]

[3]