User talk:Narrow is the way
Please refrain yourself from instilling misinformation, slanderous calumnies on Tony Alamo. This is NOT an experiment! your version is libel. Narrow is the way
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Tony Alamo. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave 17:39, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Dave 22:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
Tony Alamo
[edit]It seems that you do not understand my problem with your edits. They are clearly POV. I take great offence to that comment you left me, and I'm sure so would others who lost relatives during the holocaust, which you are using to in some way justify your edits on that page. The two, in my opinion are unrelated. Dave 21:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Please don't continue to edit war, it is disruptive and plainly clear that it is both copief from another source and a whitewash. Please tell us on the talkpage how you think the man is misrepresented (make a list of clear points, without reverting to a lecture on the man, just focus on clear ways in which the article is wrong) before making changes. Dave 23:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Blocked for 8h for incivility
[edit]Please don't do this [1]. Read WP:CIVIL instead William M. Connolley 11:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted comments. Thanks. Kevin_b_er 06:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I know it may appear raw and inappropriate at first sight, but almost everything on that page is a reflection of some component of Wikipedia culture. For example, the phrase "This administrator knows how to spell his fucking words" refers to wikipedia's rogue admins. Someone accidently spelt "rogue" as "rouge" and the joke has stuck ever since.
The "meta-template for hate reflects the controversy surrounding meta-templates. The "This user is often a dick not censored" reflects a controversy surrounding a picture of breasts in a userbox. Most of the categories at the bottom reflect controversial articles or arbcom cases. So you see, there is much more depth to the page than a quick glance may suggest.
I hope this helps explain some things. Have a nice day. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 18:53, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
Unblock request
[edit]{{unblock|reason}}
there is no reason to block as I was merely looking for someone awake to address the issue of offensive misuse of the user page
It was not non-sense, it made perfectly good sense. but someone failed to agree so they slammed me with a block.
MOST INAPPROPRIATE using slamming to render your point.
- Denied, and anyway there's really no point now; the block will only last a couple more hours. If you have a problem with Freak of Nurture's user page, the best thing would be to discuss it with him at his user talk page. If you want to ask for the help of admins in general, use the administrator's noticeboard, though in this case, I'm quite sure it wouldn't have accomplished anything. What you added to those talk pages wasn't nonsense, but it was still disruptive. Mangojuicetalk 05:15, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
I trust everything is okay with the question you ask?
[edit]Hello, I trust you've resolved the issues with the alleged vulgarities? --CyclePat 01:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)