User talk:Nariman.kirgizbaev

Welcome!

Hello, Nariman.kirgizbaev, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Minot Al Duck, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minot Al Duck

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Minot Al Duck, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Minot Al Duck, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minot Al Duck

Hello Nariman.kirgizbaev,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Minot Al Duck for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 13:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Please stop. Continuing to remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Minot Al Duck, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Frankie1969 (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minneapolis. Frankie1969 (talk) 14:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 14:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nariman.kirgizbaev (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has been hacked, below link is that my proof that my account accessed elsewhere.

Decline reason:

In this case, WP:GOTHACKED applies. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https.//samplewikihow link.com

What a curious unblock request, almost exactly the same as a couple of other recent requests at User talk:69.124.168.95, even down to the badly-formed link. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
~~Actually, I suspect this is someone who doesn't speak English and is using the word "hacked" to mean "blocked". Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]
And we have more "My account has been hacked, below link is the proof that my account was accessed elsewhere" requests at User talk:Kosi Onochie and at User talk:WikiMaster1134 - curiouser and curiouser. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]