User talk:Naqash3000

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naqash3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mistakenly removed Warning messages multiple time. Kindly unblock my id. I am new Wikipedian and looking for honest contribution. Information which i was putting is 100% accurate. You can also confirm it for locals in Kashmir. Please give me relief. Thanks. Dear Admin, Kindly unblock my id. I am honest writer and you can verify mentioned information from anywhere. Thanks

Decline reason:

This doesn't address the reason for your block, which is "repeated recreation of non-notable articles and removing CSD tags despite multiple warnings." Additionally, note that it is your responsibility to provide citations, not other people's responsibility to seek them out. Yamla (talk) 17:00, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naqash3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dear admin, i accept my mistake but you can check my profile, i never did such mistake in past. I request 'you please unblock my id. i'll be really thankful to you. I am a responsible person, Please if you'll give me chance. I'll be very careful next time.

Decline reason:

As stated above, you are not acknowledging the reasoning for your block. When creating a new article, it's up to you to provide the appropriate resources and references to show why the subject is notable. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naqash3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dear admin, i accept my mistake but you can check my profile, i never did such mistake in past. I request 'you please unblock my id. i'll be really thankful to you. I am a responsible person, Please if you'll give me chance. I'll be very careful next time.

Decline reason:

There is a history of creating articles on non-notable subject and repeated removal of CSD tags despite being told multiple times not to do so. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naqash3000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

dear admin, now i understand my mistake. In future, I'll not do disruptive editing or any act which could be violation of wikipedia policy or i'll not write non notable articles. Please unblock me. thanks

Decline reason:

You now have ignored yet another request, this to not delete unblock requests fro a current block from your page. Seeing as this is now becoming disruptive, I will remove your talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Tafheem-ul-olum High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tafheem-ul-olum High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tafheem-ul-olum High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm (talk) 06:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]