User talk:Nantemacmak

Welcome!

Hello, Nantemacmak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alpha Sigma Epsilon

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Alpha Sigma Epsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

As a general rule, local fraternities—those with only one chapter—are not notable. If you can demonstrate that the fraternity has chapters at multiple universities, the notability issue would go away. —C.Fred (talk) 03:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Alpha Sigma Epsilon, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You recreated the article but did not make clear how it is significant or important beyond one university. If you are unclear about the requirements, please ask here. —C.Fred (talk) 04:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tau Gamma Phi, you will be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Alpha Sigma Epsilon has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Articles must be in neutral point of view. They should not be copies, word-for-word, of the subject's website. They may not be copies when that text is under copyright, and a copyright notice is displayed on the bottom of the page.[1] Finally, when editing, you removed the categories from the article. These are important to the articles, as they help classify them. Please be careful when editing that you don't remove categories or other useful items. —C.Fred (talk) 16:20, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Alpha Sigma Epsilon. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Do not copy material from the ASE website to the article. Not only is it inappropriate from the standpoint of neutral point of view, but it also infringes copyright. —C.Fred (talk) 02:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent copyright violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —C.Fred (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be adding the same infringing text to the Alpha Sigma Epsilon article. Do not add it again. If you feel it should be included, please explain, on a talk page, why it should be. —C.Fred (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alpha Sigma Epsilon

The article Alpha Sigma Epsilon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Raziman T V (talk) 13:23, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article History Of Alpha Sigma Epsilon or crest in USA has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as History Of Alpha Sigma Epsilon or crest in USA, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.The local fraternity that was ASE in the US wound up evolving into a single chapter of a national fraternity. It clearly has no significance or importance. If it's related to ASE of the Philippines, it can be rolled into the article there. If not, do not add an article for it. In any case, it needs to be in original and clear prose and not copied in chunks from the chapter's website. —C.Fred (talk) 17:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alpha Sigma Epsilon Fraternity/Sorority

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Alpha Sigma Epsilon Fraternity/Sorority requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Alpha Sigma Epsilon Fraternity/Sorority, you will be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:59, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 09:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]