User talk:Namosin

Replaceable fair use File:Wes Scanlin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wes Scanlin.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 19:07, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blurred Lines Thank you for the clarification on this. I had improperly uploaded this photo and selected the wrong copyright selection. I re-uploaded the photo with a smaller pixel size to fit in the infobox and indicated that it does fall under fair use under the Creative Commons license. I believe that I attributed the author and copyright information correctly. Let me know if you see anything else. Thanks again. Namosin 17:37 13 October 2013 (UTC)