User talk:Namanshoni
Welcome!
[edit]
|
March 2014
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Oru modhal oru kadhal has been reverted.
Your edit here to Oru modhal oru kadhal was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwFpXeZltoE, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXnFzNU_lWc, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaP8Tm41qnc) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Namanshoni, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]
|
Hi Namanshoni! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Reply
[edit]Hi Nammu, using my talk page is fine or you can respond here, I'll be watching the page! Uploading images depends on where you obtained them from, where did you get the images you want to upload and what are they of? I take it you're wanting to upload some for Oru Modhal Oru Kadhal? Samwalton9 (talk) 08:30, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please see the instructions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and/or Wikipedia:Non-free content. Sam Walton (talk) 20:12, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Pedavi Datani Matokatundhi (film)
[edit]Hello, Namanshoni,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pedavi Datani Matokatundhi (film) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pedavi Datani Matokatundhi (film) .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
Jamez42 (talk) 22:24, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
[edit]Hello Namanshoni. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Namanshoni. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Namanshoni|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem on Pedavi Datani Matokatundhi
[edit]
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 10:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of TG Keerthi Kumar for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TG Keerthi Kumar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TG Keerthi Kumar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 14:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Flash Frame Visuals Academy of Film and Television has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No evidence this institute passes GNG. Unsourced, and all of the sources I can find are either listing in directories and user-generated school ratings sties or are written in the first person, indicating self-published advertising information or press releases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
The article T Guru Prasad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:TOOSOON. Just one notable work listed here. On checking that movie also, one would wonder if that should be PROD'd too.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)