User talk:Nakon/archive1

This is an archived page. Please do not edit this page. If you are currently in a discussion on this page, please continue it on the main page.

Welcome!

Hello Nakon/archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 04:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please explain why you continue to revert a user page for an IP. -joe

Because when you blank the page, you remove the shared IP information. User:Naconkantari:Naconkantari 00:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. I understand.

Hello. I see you have been busy reverting vandalism! Thanks! Tito xd^{(?!? - did you read this?)} 22:54, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I second that motion - many thanks from me, too. B.Wind 23:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user and talk pages. All cleaned up before I even got a chance to see them! You're on the ball man. Good job. =) Lantoka 01:40, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hani

You caught vandalism to my beloved Hani Hanjour just as I was reverting it myself, much thanks for your work! :) Sherurcij ^{(talk) (bounties)}

Sermi-protection

I saw you just reverted vandalism on George W. Bush, and wondered what you thought about the proposals to curb what's going on there. If you have time, check out Wikipedia:Semi-protection policy, and weigh in (there's something of a large discussion page, so be prepared. For a quick run-through of what's been said and done, see #rehashing) Hope to see you there. -Mys e kurity^{(have you seen this?)} 04:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Catching vandalism

Hi there, thanks for your work! I'm just wondering what you monitor to catch vandalism - Special:Recent changes? The IRC rc dumper? Dan100 (Talk) 11:53, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for vandalising

I was testing the reaction time of the admins. You will recieve a barnstar for your good work... 202.180.83.6 02:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for good work...

You performed well in my random acts of vandalism test, well done, 202.180.83.6 02:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

For obvious reasons, my true identity will remain a mystery.... 202.180.83.6 02:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page yesterday. ERcheck 01:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism. It's good to see the people are helping me on a day that I'm too ill to do it myself... --05:48, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Thank you.

I'd like to thank you for fixing the vandalism on my Userpage. I've noticed you've done this for a lot of people and I'd like to say kepp up the good work.--Canageek 15:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You can't....

You can't block me! Didn't you see the notice that says this IP is used by a good editor, unless I'm him. So you should call him before editing..... 202.180.83.6 23:30, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one that will block you, that decision is up to Wikipedia's administrators. NaconKantari 23:31, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for reverting vandalism on my userpage. That was new. CanadianCaesar 03:30, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikithanks!

In honor of your reverting vandalism on mine and the above user's pages, I give you Wikithanks!--Kross | Talk 18:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding vandalism by 216.144.187.5

Yeah, I, being the responsible person, will have to apologize all the vandalism coming from here. Please understand that this is all coming from school, and thus, is shared throughout my entire district. I understand your concerns for all the vandalism coming from this page, but it's not coming from all one person. Thus, I beg that you do not ban this IP from editing, since there are students who have made productive edits.

With Kind Regards, Socks

W.marsh's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA. The final outcome was (30/2/0). I will do my best at the position I now am in. Thanks again! --W.marsh 03:46, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Biffeche

Hi, I've done a complete rewrite with references and am requesting people who voted to have a look at the new version. Thanks. Dlyons493 Talk 18:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

I don't know if blanking is the correct word for it, but why did you revert my (i am an anon.) valid edit to The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Just because you are a registered user, it gives you the right to tarr me with the same brush of vandals? Fortunately, your 'edit' was reverted.

Merry Xmas

Sam

I reverted the blanking that occurred on line 48 of the article [[1]]. --NaconKantari 22:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Knots Landing revert

Thanks ;-) Juppiter 23:12, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Slipknot

Bah! Beat me to the revert and vandalism warning! *pokes you in the eye with a stick* :) IainP (talk) 00:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my page. I saw yours going on but wasn't quite quick enough to help. Thanks so much!--ViolinGirl^♪ 01:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Always happy to help. --NaconKantari 01:16, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And a thank-you from me as well. :)
Regards, Sango 123 (talk) 01:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thankyou very much for reverting the vandalism to my user page. User:Siddiqui

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari 04:40, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Steeling the Mind Bible Conference

Actually, you might want to ask Jason Gastrich who owns this jcsm.org he's all over the Wikipedia trying to insert links to and who gets the money from all those ads on the site. (Hint: his initials are "Jason Gastrich") Mark K. Bilbo 05:50, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I just found some of your edits - really nice. I wish you a happy and prosperous New Year, and an active 2006. --Bhadani 11:02, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RC patrol

You are doing an excellent job reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work! Owen× ☎ 17:58, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from Deathphoenix

Hi NK,

I just wanted to thank you for supporting me in my RfA. To tell you the truth, I was surprised by all the support I've gotten. I never saw myself as more than an occasional Wiki-hobbyist.

My wife sends her curses, as Wikipedia will likely suck up more of my time. She jokingly (I think) said she was tempted to log on to Wikipedia just to vote Oppose and let everyone know that she didn't want her husband to be an admin.

I'll make sure your trust in me is founded. --D e ath phoenix 15:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I was promoted with a final tally of 31/1/1. Please don't hesitate to contact me if there is anything I can assist. --BorgQueen 22:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Link spam

Can you notify an administrator to block 24.0.106.19 for putting commercial link spam into articles. I have reverted about 40 link spam so far and he won't stop. Thanks! RJN 03:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reported. If you would like to contact an administrator regarding a vandal, please do so on [2] this page. Thanks --NaconKantari 03:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page! Sometimes, I don't know why even I bother trying to keep high school entries from turning into garbage. ;) Jasmol 03:23, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick reverts of vandalism... you keep beating me to them! Triona 03:42, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revert warning

That user has been vandalizing about 4 or 5 different pages and is being reverted by lots of different editors. He is also trying to turn himself into the victim. I'm in danger of losing my cool, true, but this is mostly because his edits are racist and childish beyond belief. Best, Tfine80 04:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gundam seed destiny

Why edit my post away? the director is a wonderful cool guy.--65.26.150.243 04:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It was against Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy: [3] --NaconKantari 04:32, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, didn't know they had one. Thanks for the tip. --65.26.150.243 04:34, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

tagging articles for speedy

G'day Naconkantari,

I recently deleted an article you'd tagged as speedy. While the article was a clear candidate for speedying, the edit where you added the tag was marked as minor. The "minor edit" feature was intended for when you do really minor stuff, like correcting a typo or adding a space. It's not intended for when you tag articles for deletion which, let's face it, is about as major an edit as you can get. Cheers, fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 04:49, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't notice that as I have my preferences set for always select minor edit. Thanks for the heads-up! --NaconKantari 04:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

apologies, and a question

I have apparently misunderstood the external-link policy. I did not see in it any outright ban on linking to my own site, only a note that "external links should support the content of the article, not replace it." I very carefully sought out some Wiki articles about some of the people I've interviewed for my author-interview website, and then placed links to my site in the appropriate "External links" section. If this is a violation of protocol, I certainly apologize, and won't do it again. But now my question: why are links to other sites that are similar to mine permitted? (e.g. The Diane Rehm show, Leonard Lopate show, Don Swaim of CBS, etc) Is it ONLY because I submitted the links myself? Bill 05:14, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Could you please provide a direct link to an example? Thanks --NaconKantari 05:17, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Each of these pages has an external link to an interview or media site like mine: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Gabaldon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_McCourt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Buchwald http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Alda My site, by the way, is http://www.eyeonbooks.com. It's all author interviews. Am I too "commercial" in that I am an Amazon Associate? I do not sell anything myself. Bill 05:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

According to [4], Links that are added to promote a site, by the site operator or its affiliates are generally not allowed. --NaconKantari 05:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I assume, therefore, that no person connected in any way to the above-mentioned shows was responsible for any of those links. And I assume that the fact that most of those sites are Amazon affiliates, too, and could theoretically benefit from a Wiki link is irrelevant. I will refrain from further linking. Bill 05:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

because?

because its intention is to erase my articulos? that it has of bad that speaks on macheneco? macheneco is a language and that space is deserved

--HeKeIsDa 02:36, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I placed a {{cleanup}} tag on the article. That doesn't imply that the article should be deleted and I don't believe the article should be deleted, just improved. --NaconKantari 02:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- - thank you very much by the explanation, luck and happy celebrations

--HeKeIsDa 02:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NCV

Hi Naconkantari!

Thanks for your help with regard to that kid... we call him the North Carolina Vandal. He's on just about every day, vandalising Riven, places in NC, elitism, ... lots of things, always with a new username. Cheers! Antandrus (talk) 03:30, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Max Beesley

Thanks for taking the speedy deletion notice off of this article. I was looking at my argument both on the speedy deletion article and the Max Beesley talk page. I think I may have come accross more strongly than I intended. If you feel I insulted you, please know it wasn't intentional and I apologize. :-) (Stephen Day 23:56, 31 December 2005 (UTC))[reply]

No, I think that I just tagged the article a little too quickly. --NaconKantari 23:58, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

For reverting my user page numerous times, it is appreciated. KnowledgeOf Self | talk 03:46, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

semi-protection

Due to the high level of vandalism on your user page, I have semi-protected it against anon changes. I'll try to remember to remove this later, but if you want it removed just let me know. Keep up the good work - when you are annoying the vandals you are doing something right. --Doc ^ask? 23:44, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the semi-protection. Hopefully it can be removed in a few hours when the vandalism dies down. --NaconKantari 23:45, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello

I am rather annoyed at my gaybys wiki being deleted. It is at least as valid as the ytmnd entry and was going to form part of a series of wikis on the famous Special Reserve. I thank your dullard admins for their intolerance and lack of knowledge outside their own little worlds.

Goodbye. Tim merm jones 23:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC) merm[reply]

quick addition

'gayby' and a number of the terms that were contained within that article before its deletion, are internet memes.

ty pld Tim merm jones 23:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

thanks for reverting, but you really should use minor edits for reversion Sceptr e ^(Talk) 23:37, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

nersh

what exactly was your problem with Jonathan Nash? not a single thing there was a lie. Tim merm jones

The name failed a Google test. If you could point me in the right direction to find out more information about this person, that would help. Also, please don't create nonsense articles like Naconkantari and add "what a sad bastard." That's against WP:NPA. --NaconKantari 23:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

70.132.2.192

The 3RR rule is the least of this user's issues, he's just vandalizing to cause trouble. Look at his contributions. He should be blocked as soon as possible. KI 00:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I don't remember adding a 3RR tag, I must have not noticed when I did it. --NaconKantari 00:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can help (and you did:)

Thanks to you and all who helped take care of the Richard O'Connor article while it was on the mainpage. The RC patrol and CV unit truly ROCK most righteously, and I salute you! Once more, thanks--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 03:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

64.12.195.67

They have done some more vandalism to Vampires Rock... Fosnez 04:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

really i saw that and been vandalism to Vampires Rock lasr 2 hpirs ago KanuT 19:49, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

71.253.34.199

ok, i'm sorry. it's just that i feel so passionate about things, and i can't stand seeing things that i know to be bald-faced, politically motivated lies sitting unchallenged. i understand, it's a free country, a free world (for the most part), and people have the right to lie. it's just that so many lies bunched together at once... it's depressing. really is. i'll quit messing with the pages from now on, and just write the truth on my own. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.253.34.199 (talk • contribs)

Mudlinks

Please help me explain to Mudlinks on his talk page why his links are SPAM and not welcome here. Onthost 00:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia:External links: What should not be linked to includes "Links that are added to promote a site, by the site operator or its affiliates." The user that made the edits, User:Mudlists, edited articles to add a link to Mudlists.com. This type of self-promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. --NaconKantari 00:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bug in your rollback?

Hey, I may be wrong but I thought I'd mention it to you, because I noticed that on the England page when you were reverting that vandalism that your rollback button changed the these < > on the page and made some of the text appear funny in my browser. You may already know about this or something, but I figured it couldn't hurt to say something. Peace, delldot | talk 03:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll look into it. --NaconKantari 03:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second that. I've looked at some of your reverts and they seem to change the "&" (amperstand) char to the html-code for that char. It shouldn't do that, so if you can look into that aswell, it would be great. See for instance: this diff where I reverted you. Anyway, thanks for all the work you do to revert vandalism. Shanes 18:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My user page

Thanks for the revert. :) Dharmabum420 03:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari 03:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work

Hi Naconkantari,

Just wanted to let you know the anti-vandalism you're doing is greatly appreciated. Keep up the good work! Kander 04:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --NaconKantari 04:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for repairing the vandalism to my user page! Peace, delldot | talk 05:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari 05:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

I hereby award you this Barnstar for your tireless efforts in countering vandalism. Especially thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. -- KTC 11:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Watson

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to this page; however, you also changed the "<" and ">" surrounding edit comments to "<" and ">", making those comments visible to the readers of the article. Those comments are meant to be visible only during the edit process. I've made the reversion. (See "bug in your rollback", above.) Radio Kirk talk to me 18:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revert bug

Hi Naconkatari. Whatever tool you are using to do "Rollbacks" (reverts) has a bug see this edit: [5]. If you are using User:Sam Hocevar's java script an updated version fixes this. Please fix before using again thanks. Paul August ☎ 18:18, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link, I updated the script and hopefully it won't happen again. --NaconKantari 18:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good. You also might want to take a look at your previous "rollbacks" to see if any others introduced errors which have not been corrected. Thanks. Paul August ☎ 20:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted some entity conversions on the death metal page. Good to see it's been taken care of. -- Parasti 00:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vand

Hi, thnx for the reverts on my user page. :) I dont think he likes me :) Joe I 00:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari 00:00, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of other wholly irrelevant content.

Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia.

What Vandalism am I accused of?--

File:South park lebowski avas-film-23.jpg

"That's just, like, your opinion, man."

Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 01:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a diff link to the alleged vandalism that I reverted. --NaconKantari 01:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

start of section

==Vandalism==

Regarding the page George W. Bush, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 00:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said: What vandalism?...I make no apologies for adding to the historical record. Putting up a still image taken from video of the president that misrepresents his moving his hand across his face in an attempt to indicate that he was giving the finger to the American people is vandalism. You will get blocked for this sort of thing if it continues. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 01:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page George W. Bush, this is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 01:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please stop targeting one or more users' talk pages for abuse or insults, unwarranted doctoring or blanking. It can be seen as vandalism and may get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NaconKantari 01:16, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? What vandalism? I was talking with an adnministrator about an image I had used for one of my userboxes. He said it did not belong on Wikipedia in an article. A picture used in an article would be more appropriate. I had a pic of George W. Bush, which suited what I needed. The pic was perfect for the article on George W. Bush, as it was lacking in objectivity and seem to whitewash the subject a bit. If there is any offense to George W. Bush giving the finger to the American people, take it up with him. But, I make no apologies for contributing to the historical record.--

File:South park lebowski avas-film-23.jpg

"That's just, like, your opinion, man."

Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 01:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:You said: What vandalism?...I make no apologies for adding to the historical record. Putting up a still image taken from video of the president that misrepresents his moving his hand across his face in an attempt to indicate that he was giving the finger to the American people is vandalism. You will get blocked for this sort of thing if it continues. WAvegetarian ^(talk) (email) ^(contribs) 01:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, excuse me? HE DID give the finger to the American people, and proudly bragged of his "victory salute". I can send a video clip if you'd like.--

File:South park lebowski avas-film-23.jpg

"That's just, like, your opinion, man."

Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 01:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

end of section

That picture is inappropriate and taken out of context. I stand by my decision to remove it. Also, please consider removing the userbox from your signature, as it is very large. --NaconKantari 01:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Context of Bush photo

What was out of context about a glimpse behind-the-scenes of a public figure? I made a mistake putting it next to a paragraph about his alleged religious beliefs. But, I feel that more information available on a given subject is usually better than less, for an informed public. Below is the further conversation I've been having with WAvegetarian about the context of the photo and the relevance to American history, such as it is.

Upon further research, your insinuation that this was to the American people is utterly baseless. He was goofing off before the taping of something else. He never bragged about it. He said in response to the laughs it garnered from the camera crew, "It's just my one fingered victory salute." It never went to air. It doesn't add anything to the article. It certainly doesn't belong in his religious beliefs section. You are in violation of WP:POINT and WP:NPOV. Should you continue in such a manner I will refer you to an admin to carry out the warning above. WAvegetarian (talk) (email) (contribs) 01:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Advice

Wait a minute. How have I violated WP:POINT and WP:NPOV? Having just skimmed through it, I may not be as well versed in Wikipedia rules as some. But, I did not "try to make a point", other than contribute to an article that seemed a little more than biased in favor of the subject (My use of the image in a userbox is another issue altogether). If there is any POV violation it would be the author of the page and defenders of it. Regardless if Bush knew the camera was on, his true beliefs on the subject of his election are clear (despite whatever whitewashed babble his handlers ensure the public see) He said in response to the laughs he got as his "one fingered victory salute" isn't bragging? Excuse me? The only reason these things aren't commonly known (which would be useful to the public) is because they are censored and sent down the memory hole. How else is something going to be the "official" public record? Must the man publicly abuse an audience of thousands for history to record what he really was? By that reasoning, Nixon's tapes should never have been disclosed, the Pentagon Papers should never have become publicly known, and human history would look a lot like the old Soviet Union's version of things, down the memory hole.--Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 02:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--

File:South park lebowski avas-film-23.jpg

"That's just, like, your opinion, man."

Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 02:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you could create a paragraph about the picture and place the picture next to it. --NaconKantari 02:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm searching for more details about the specifics of what happened when this picture was taken. It may take me some time. On a sidenote, I was hoping I could still use it in a userbox. Maybe it's too soon after this friction over the pic, it seems to piss people off very easily. I guess I have a talent for that.--

File:South park lebowski avas-film-23.jpg

"That's just, like, your opinion, man."

Mike Nobody ¿ =/\= 03:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you so much for helping keep my work on the Jackson Soloist page clean. I have put alot of work in it and a few guys really helped refine the article and I am very upset with it being vandalized, but am happy you are helping maintain some order.

Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my user page ! No Guru 23:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Hmm. Seems every time that I start to do a revert for vandalism, you've nailed it before me, so you've got me curious — are you using a program to assist you? I've started to use CDVF, which I like, but I'm not aware if there's a feature that'll save me the time from going to the history manually and typing out the "Reverted edits by..." bit. Any help would be appreciated. Deadsalmon 04:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I use a modified monobook.js file that adds a rollback link to every article. --NaconKantari 01:30, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My User Page

Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my User Page. NatusRoma 05:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto! Darth Panda 23:14, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very quick

How can you always be so quick to revert without being a sysop (provided Special:Listadmins be up to date)? ♦ Pabix ℹ 22:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a modified monobook.js file that puts a rollback link on every article. --NaconKantari 22:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I too, thanks to Sam Hocevar. But maybe you're closer to Florida than me (near Paris in fact) ♦ Pabix ℹ

Reverts

Good work on all the reverts, but I suggest you take some time to inform individuals what you have done by using the test templates. Thanks, JHMM13 (T | C) 22:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the reverts to the continual vandalism to the Abmamoff page. How do we get the vandal to stop? Sholom 21:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List the vandal on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism --NaconKantari 21:27, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- I just gave it a try -- Sholom 21:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Krashlandon

The blanking you reverted on my userpage was a test by my un-logged-in self, a self-vandalism if you will, to test how long it takes for vandalisms to be reverted. It was 30 seconds. Please do not take action on my ip. :) Krashlandon 23:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're an admin, could you remove that log from my ip's user contributions? I don't want it to cause any confusion in the future. Thanks. Krashlandon 17:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would, but I am not an administrator. --NaconKantari 20:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I'm thinking about someone else. You should apply though. You more than qualify. Krashlandon 21:13, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think that my account is too new for any good to come out of a RfA. Mabye in a few months. --NaconKantari 21:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But how do you have a rollback button if you are not an admin? Is it your .js file that you keep saying that you have? How can I get one? Krashlandon 21:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Information about modifying your monobook.js file can be found at Monobook. You can just copy the text from mine at User:Naconkantari/monobook.js and paste it into yours. --NaconKantari 21:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll try it. Krashlandon

It's not working. It keeps formatting it weirdly. Krashlandon 22:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, I don't need it. After seeing how rollbacks can go wrong (and on this page even) and having to fix the page myself, I'm not sure I want it. I'll just stick with regular reverts until I'm an admin. Krashlandon 02:40, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, lets try this again

I have a few questions regarding a comment that I think you made about me. 1. Was that an automated respose because I was on wikipedia for the first time? 2. How did that guy delete my comment? That seemed very rude. \ WisePitfighter 02:04, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It says at the top of the page that unsigned comments will be considered vandalism. Krashlandon 02:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great, I think I overwrote someone else's comment. I'm having some difficulties here >.< WisePitfighter

Im just going to go away now and read some more FAQ's

Could you please point me to the automated comment in question? I checked your contributions and all you had were edits to my usertalk page. --NaconKantari 02:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Furey article

Many thanks for countering those, I never can monitor a watchlist enough to catch idiots like that. Any chance we could ban that IP from ever posting? I'm actually confused as to how he did, I thought since everyone needed to register to make changes that there would be no more IPs. Anyway, I commented on his user page. Tyciol 10:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The livesinmom'sbasement vandal

Interesting problem there with AIV. Because all the nonsense articles were speedied, there wasn't any evidence anymore of the vandalism...unless we know what the articles were named to go look at the deleted histories. I'll bring that up on talk. :) --Syrthiss 22:07, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting me on my successful RfA! It passed with a final tally of 40/9/1. If there's anything I can do to help, just ask! Sceptr e ^(Talk)

My RfA

Naconkantari, thank you very much for supporting me during my recent RfA campaign! Thanks to you, I am now an admin. Please drop by if you need anything - I'll be glad to help you. Once again, thanks! --M @t hwiz 2020 22:55, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Issue for Voices From the Gathering Storm

The comments cited in my submittal were copied from text on my own web site. I haved added the GFDL to the footer of the index.html page. (http:/www.voicesfromthegatheringstorm.com). Please let me know what hoops remain. Thank you. Datacorner 01:24, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the copyvio tag from the page. --NaconKantari 01:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks from rogerd

File:Baseball (ball) closeup.jpg

Hi Naconkantari- Thanks for your support on my RfA. If I can be of any service please leave me a message --rogerd 01:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suma Ching Hai

Hello, keep keeping an eye on this page, as there is one anon person IP, who seems to be a cult disciple and keeps on blanking the controversies about his/her master. He/she had alreeeady blanked it on Jan3rd. Blnguyen 01:56, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okay sorry I was just a little uptight that's all it won't happen again sorry 24.127.127.18 00:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)hello[reply]

Thanks for vandal fix

Thanks for the vandalism revert on my user page! --StuffOfInterest 00:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari 00:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Anti-Group

Don't think this one qualifies as a speedy. Side project of Clock DVA, and on Allmusic (as T.A.C.G.). Suggest you stick it on AfD instead. exolon 01:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the information. --NaconKantari 01:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy that I placed on the article and instead put a cleanup and stub tag. --NaconKantari 01:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned it up a bit, and added a very brief intro para for context. I'm guessing they meet WP:Music due to the number of albums, but I don't know. exolon 01:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for RfA

Sceptre would like to nominate you to be an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Sceptre to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nakon/archive1. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

19:35, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination! I hope that I can become a valued administrator for the Wikipedia community. --NaconKantari 20:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Naconkantari

I thank you for reverting vandalism to my user talkpage (and userpage as I see now) yesterday afternoon. I noticed the vandalism, but you got there first to revert it. I'm sorry I did not thank you right away, but I was in a rush and had to leave.

~~I will be sure to support your administrator nomination.~~I will be sure to support your RFA if you decide to run for it in the future.

See you around 8-P

Link9er 23:30, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --NaconKantari 23:55, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Barnstar

		An Award
		I hereby award this Minor Barnstar to NaconKantari. Minor edits are often-overlooked, but essential, contributions to the Wikipedia. This Minor Barnstar is awarded for making many minor edits of the utmost quality. It does not imply that major contributions have not been made as well. (KC)

Chris the speller 00:11, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, Nacon. Krashlandon 03:08, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frat Pack

I can only assume you shall continue to catch the vandalism on the Frat Pack page quicker than me. I commend you work and will leave you to do it in peace. (LordFenix 05:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Good work

I hereby award you this Anti-Vandalism barnstar for your tireless work in countering vandalism on Wikipedia. Congratulations!--Alhutch 05:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i admit i don't know how to format barnstars.--Alhutch 05:42, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations. You certainly deserve it. Krashlandon (e) 23:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for The Ottomen

This is a friendly reminder that (according to consensus) the {{afd}} tag is always supposed to be used with subst:. Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the tip. --NaconKantari 16:10, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Karen Dotrice

With a great deal of input, my first article from scratch is up for Featured Article status (self-nominated). Feel free to visit and vote! Radio Kirk talk to me 18:56, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tupac Shakur

Was tupac not african? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.1.86.110 (talk • contribs) .

Please try to avoid using ALL CAPS in your edits. [6] --NaconKantari 03:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hm?

Why do you insist on deleting splack and bugbite? Though obscure, they are true words. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by B-l (talk • contribs) .

I don't delete them, an administrator does. If you do not agree with the deletion, please take it up with the administrator that deleted the page. A list of deleted pages can be found at Special:Log. --NaconKantari 03:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sheesh!

Every time I go to revert some vandalism or linkspam tonight, you seem to have fixed it first. Keep up the good work! --GraemeL ^(talk) 22:06, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Hi, could you please move Tanoan to Tanoan languages please. My account is rather new and I can't do it. Thanks. Latinus 22:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the move has been completed. If there are any problems, please don't hesitate to ask. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 22:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Latinus 22:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross site scripting

This was an attempt at a cross site scripting attack. I would suggest using {{bv}} if you see it again. The MediaWiki software shouldn't let it work, but the mere act of attempting it is blatant vandalism. --GraemeL ^(talk) 22:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the information. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 22:57, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my userpage! -- Ferkelparade π 23:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 23:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto, thanks! - Dharmabum420 23:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Africa

Hi, when you reverted vandalism on Africa you missed that the previous edit was vandalism as well, so you reverted to a Creationist vandalized version. Just thought I'd let you know, it's now fixed. TH 09:06, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayboy

Please revisit the discussion. Uncle G 13:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Why did you revert my comment on REddragon's page? I was being nice and helpful? Why do lie and call that vandalism? You should be demoted to Shiia you liar. 165.247.83.151 21:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How can it be helpful if the user is new and only has three edits?. All of your other edits have also been vandalism. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 21:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have no right to revert my edits you fraud. You mongoloid khan. 165.247.83.151 21:48, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 21:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: I've blocked this user for 24 hours. FreplySpang (talk) 22:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 22:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

V7ndotcom Elursrebmem Deletion

Hi, I noticed you voted to on the abovementioned article. Initialy I wanted to keep it, but when I compared it to Nigritude ultramarine and Seraphim proudleduck it seems obvious that all theese articles are repating the same info:

It's a search contest
It has begin/end dates
It has a prize
It uses a unique phrase that is not used before

I'd like to urge you to change your vote to Redirect to SEO Contest where I have created already made a copy of the article. This way they dont have "their own article" but they are mentioned in the encyclopedia. Seems like a compromise to me. Right now w/ all the Delete, Keep, And Redirect votes it will be hard to reach a compromise.This user has left wikipedia 22:15, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your help over at User talk:165.247.83.151 today. :-D SWD316 ^{talk to m}^e 00:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism at my user page

Thanks a lot for reverting! yeah. I mean it! You're the best! I'm not here often, so wouldn't have noticed it until much later. --NielsFTalk to me.. 20:47, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 20:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hello, Naconkantari, I love the way you are "patrolling vandalism." I'ts so great, keep it up! I don't like anybody vandalising either. thankyou Abbopa 22:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As is not required by law, and despite misgivings

Thanx for reverting the obnoxious 64.92 vandal ;D ! 68.39.174.238 23:42, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 00:08, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dieter Dierks page/ copyright violation

Hi Naconkantari, it was my first time writing on wikipedia and I did not read the instructions well enough. I am sorry. I copied the article from another website to wikipedia. It was tagged right away, which led me to actually read the instructions... So I took advantage of the subpage and wrote my own original article from scratch, as suggested. The article can be replaced now and I am sorry, but I didn't know what I was doing. That's not going to happen again!Conciacalis 00:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Conciacalis[reply]

RfA Thanks

Please accept my embarrassingly belated thank you for supporting my RfA, which much to my surprise passed 102/1/1, earning me minor notoriety. I am grateful for all the supportive comments, and have already started doing the things people wanted me to be able to do. And hopefully nothing else... Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C]

AfD? 12:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Busy

Wow, it looks like you've been busy. Here's a cup of anti-stress so you don't lose your mind. Krashlandon (e) 13:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you, Nakon/archive1
	for voting in my RFA. It failed with a result of 31/11/2. Thank you anyway for your vote. If you have any comments, please say so here.

Welcome to Esperanza!

Welcome, Nakon/archive1, to Esperanza, the Wikipedia member association! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is the StressUnit, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. Redwolf24 runs the spam to keep members up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Possibles.

I encourage you to take an active voice in the running of Esperanza. We have a small government system, headed by our Administrator general, Celestianpower, and guided by the Advisory Committee comprised of FireFox, Flcelloguy, Titoxd, and Karmafist. The next set of elections will be in February, and I would be glad to see you vote, or even consider running for a position.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact Celestianpower by email or talk page or the Esperanza talk page. Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 21:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I am making an effort to discuss on the articles talk page, user Alex 101 refuses to source any work and keeps vandalising work on the article - Deathrocker 03:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Naconkantari. My apologies. But, what happened of why I broke the 3RR rule is that I've been having a problem with Deathrocker being unconvinced with what I reverted on the My Chemical Romance. I've tried discussing this problem on his/her talk page but he kept deleting my messages as well. He/she is also calling me "vandal" on that article Alex 101 03:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To both users, please discuss your changes on the talk page. The article has been protected from editing by an administrator until both of you can come to an agreement. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:42, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting my userpage. Gerard Foley 18:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 19:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Esperanza

Tell me, did you join Esperanza because of the coffee stressbuster I gave you? Krashlandon (e) 11:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Yes. I was thinking about joining for some time, but when I recieved the stressbuster from you, I decided that Esperanza was a really useful group to join, because of the strong sense of community that it generates on Wikipedia. Thanks! --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 13:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neat! I'm glad I helped. You should consider joining the Esperanza stressbusters group. They moniter for stress and serve as a kind of wiki-crisis intervention group. You seem to be in touch with so many users, so you would be perfect for the job. Check it out here. Krashlandon (e) 13:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. KHM03 22:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, no problem. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 22:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succesful RfA!

Thank you for your support during my RfA! The community has decided to make me an administrator, and there's work to be done. I look forward to seeing you around the project in the future, and if you see me do anything dumb, let me know right away! Regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 23:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

confusing the newbies?

You accused beardedmonk of blanking pages but which pages has he blanked - Special:Contributions/Beardedmonk ?? -- RHaworth 09:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was in response to this edit --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 15:05, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I misread the history and thought he had created the school article. Sorry to bother you. -- RHaworth 19:35, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Admin?

Hi, you're not an admin, are you. I'll nominate you if you like - just give me the green light ;-) Latinus 15:02, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, at least for now. I'd like to wait until I have at least three months before under my belt before trying to become an administrator. Feel free, however, to nominate me anytime after March 13. Thanks --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 17:55, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good for you, by being patient and respecting the RfA process, I believe you will be well rewarded when the time comes. :-) NoSeptember ^talk 21:45, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An Esperanzial note

As I remember, the last spam that was handed out was on the 20th of December last year, so I think it's time for another update. First and foremost, the new Advisory Council and Administrator General have been elected. They consist of myself as Admin General and FireFox, Titoxd, Flcelloguy and Karmafist as the Advisory Council. We as a group met formally for the first time on the 31st of Decembe. The minutes of this meeting can be found at WP:ESP/ACM. The next one is planned for tonight (Sunday 29 January) at 20:30 UTC and the agenda can be found at WP:ESP/ACM2.

In other news, Karmafist has set up a discussion about a new personal attack policy, which it can be found here. Other new pages include an introductory page on what to do when you sign up, So you've joined Esperanza... and a welcome template: {{EA-welcome}} (courtesy of Bratsche). Some of our old hands may like to make sure they do everything on the list as well ;) Additionally, the userpage award program proposal has become official is operational: see Wikipedia:Esperanza/User Page Award to nominate a userpage or volunteer as a judge. Also see the proposed programs page for many new proposals and old ones that need more discussion ;)

Other than that, I hope you all had a lovely Christmas and wish you an Esperanzially good new WikiYear :D Thank you! --Cel e stianpower ^háblame 16:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Message delivered by Rune.welsh using AWB. If you wish to recieve no further messages of this ilk, please sign your name here.