User talk:Nakamuradavid

The "references" you added to Mouse (computing) weren't attached to anything, nor done as proper refs. I reverted. Respond here if you'd like help figuring out what to do instead. Dicklyon (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted you again. Please look at the article's source text to see how refs are done, or ask here if you want help. Dicklyon (talk) 07:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've reverted your most recent changes to Mouse (computing), as the statements about sushi and NASA seemed to violate Wikipedia's policies on original research or maintaining a neutral point of view. Please try to use the use the preview button before you save; this prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history with dozens of edits. You might like to take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 15:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nakamuradavid,

Welcome to Wikipedia.

The "Wikipedia way" of references to an article is something that takes a bit of practice to get right.

Have you seen Help:Footnotes? Have you seen Wikipedia:About the Sandbox?

Again, welcome to Wikipedia. Happy editing. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 23:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Nakamuradavid, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to MyLife has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like it or not, what I posted was from COMMON KNOWLEDGE as Public Domain of the Internet; as NOT Copyrighted material. The previous U.S. Lawsuits (also "Public Domain") against MyLife.com as posted on the Wikipedia Article pertaining to Mylife.com are Not Neutral but do reflect the Facts.

Your Censorship is bias for MyLife.com's illegal activities (as proven in a Court of Law) not "neutral". This is called "Collusion" with Criminal Activities of MyLife.com (that MyLife.com was fined for).

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Talk:Democratic Party (United States), you may be blocked from editing. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Those are Referenced Historical FACTS of Historical Events. You can keep saying that the U.S. Constitution Article 4 Section 4 does not state, "The United States shall guarantee to every state in this Union A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.^[1] or is "Biased", that is a Written Fact, so is the reason, justification (make Democracy Illegal due to the Democracy Rebellion, Shay's Rebellion ^[2]) as to why the U.S. Founding Fathers put that into the 1787 U.S. Constitution.

That article is NOT "Neutral" and is Biased for the Democratic Party, as stated by other Wikipedia commenters of the "Talk" section; have you Censored their comments also and threatened them with permanent Censorship (blocking their editing) 'as example, other commenter:'

″"Supports a mixed economy and social justice?

″Nonsense. Who wrote this obvious lie? They support a neoliberal economy with some minimal state regulations and intervention. Mixed economy means you support a mix of state-run industries and privately-held industries. Given the Dems have supported deregulation and privatization of traditionally public services there's little evidence that they support a mixed economy now if they ever really did since FDR. And social justice? A meaningless phrase with no way to qualify or quantify. Anyone can claim to support social justice but what does it really mean? And from what I understand of the common definition, nebulous as it may be, that the Democratic Party couldn't even qualify under those vague standards. Can someone with an account please remove this nonsense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.54.140 (talk) 00:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)"″

The proof of what I stated in the "Talk" section is from Wikipedia's own articles pertaining to those Historical Events that I used as References; are you going to Edit those Wikipedia Articles that I used as References to make those Wikipedia Articles "Neutral" also.

The "Talk" portion of the Article is just that "Talk" (Discussion) as NOT the "Article" being Edited; Information so that Wikipedia readers can discuss the content of the Article.

As a Real Neutralist (I vote based on my Research of each Candidate), if (rare event) I were to state my "Opinion", "Commentary", "personal analysis" I would state based on Historical Events, that, 1. The Republican Electoral College must be abolished and the Democratic Popular Votes determine the U.S. President and Vice President; resulting in the elimination of the Event of the Electoral College making Republican Presidential Candidate Bush U.S. President. The link explanation of how that happened ^[3] 2. No more Republican Representative Form of Government, as Technology (Computers) now allows the establishment of Democracy One (Person) For One Vote(s) on Everything; this eliminates the Powerful, Wealthy, etc. from BUYING U.S. Politicians of a Republican Representative Form of Government, as the Powerful, Wealthy cannot buy everybody (Entire Population of the U.S.) to advance only their own Agendas.

Nakamuradavid (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Mil Mi-24 are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 09:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So answering the questions of other Wikipedia Users at the Talk Page is against the Wikipedia Rules?Nakamuradavid (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Tomorrow When the War Began (TV series) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Alex|The|Whovian^? 01:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All I did was ADD additional Facts from other Wikipedia Sources as Wikipedia Article Red Dawn (Film) and Wikipedia Article Tomorrow When The War Began (Film), and left that up to the Author of the Wikipedia Article Tomorrow When The War Began (TV Series) to incorporate those Facts into their Article, instead of what happened to me with my Wikipedia Articles of people arbitrarily (maliciously) Editing my Wikipedia Articles to the extent that I gave up continually correcting those malicious Edits. Nakamuradavid (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, Wikipedia cannot be used as a source with itsef. And secondly, you were discussing the topic in a forum-manner, and not incorporating any edits in the article. Thirdly, no-one owns any articles, even if they initially created them - read WP:OWN for more information. Alex|The|Whovian^? 22:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"No One Owns a Wikipedia Article" explains The Why, Nobody takes responsibility nor accountability for the misinformation of Wikipedia Articles as having No "Ownership". Thank you that explains why Schools, Colleges, Universities and Wikipedia it's self as "Wikipedia cannot be used as a source with it's self"; so what is Wikipedia's Actual purpose (not the purpose stated by Wikipedia), if not to state Non Factual Opinions, as Wikipedia also disallows the Facts of Witnesses to Historical Events as Firsthand Experience (that can be easily verified by other Sources) while allowing other Sources written by Non Participants to those Historical Events as considered Valid Sources by Wikipedia. Sounds like Wikipedia is digging their own graves, to make Wikipedia Irrelevant as a Source of Any Credible Valid Information* as a Logic Trap.

The Written Wikipedia Proof of the above and below: "Wikipedia:General disclaimer, WIKIPEDIA MAKES NO GUARANTEE OF VALIDITY, Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information."

How about just saying in plain American English, that you do not like the Facts from my Research and or my Firsthand Experience. As far as incorporating my comments into the actual article(s) I leave that up to the original author as to NOT destroy the original intent of the Wikipedia Author's Article as was done to me, "Do unto others as..." as respect that most of those do not have (respect for somebody else research) that with purpose maliciously for some kind of perverted fun edit (destroy) Wikipedia Articles. As Wikipedia as self defeating by discouraging my kind of respect for other's research and Wikipedia Articles by allowing the original Authors the opportunity to incorporate my research into their Articles or not.Nakamuradavid (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Orangemike. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Talk:Democratic Party (United States) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:18, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Orangemike, "Neutral" or not, those are Historically Documented Events.Nakamuradavid (talk) 21:27, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

″Hello, I'm Orangemike. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view."

I will say this AGAIN, "opinions" are NOT FACTS by Definition (Webster's College Dictionary), "FACTS are derived from Firsthand Experience and or Firsthand Observations", of which Wikipedia does NOT allow, like my participation as a U.S. Military Officer at the "Middle East" since the Iran Iraq Wars to current.Nakamuradavid (talk) 12:26, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TP

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page TP. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"*Do not insert external links or references" - Leschnei

READ the Wikipedia Reference Requirements. You cannot use "internal Wikipedia Articles as Reference". Therefore you MUST use Links, Articles, References from External to Wikipedia ONLY.Nakamuradavid (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are confusing articles and disambiguation pages. Please read the section below, Disambiguation pages and TP. Leschnei (talk) 16:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Aniara (film)

Hello, Nakamuradavid,

Thanks for creating Aniara (film)! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 23:28, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a little confused, Leschnei (talk) 22:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC) regarding my contributions to Wikipedia "TP" wrote

   '″″Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
   Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
   Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
       Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
   Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
   Do not insert external links or references'Bold text'' Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:26, 19 May 2019 (UTC)″″'Italic text

SO WHAT DO I DO? "Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

DO I or DO I NOT add "Do not insert external links or references"Nakamuradavid (talk) 12:47, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My comments above were for disambiguation pages only. For articles, you should definitely added reliable sources. Leschnei (talk) 16:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aniara (film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aniara (film), does not have any sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Reference ^[4] Nakamuradavid (talk) 15:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages and TP

Nakamuradavid, you say that you do not understand what to do - I would suggest that you read through WP:disambiguation. It is too long to repeat here, but here are some basics. Disambiguation pages are not articles. They are merely navigation aids to help readers find the page that they are looking for. For example, if a reader searches for 'TP', looking for an album (for example), their search will take them to the disambiguation page and they can find out if Wikipedia has an article on the album that they are interested in.

Because they are merely navigation aids, they should not have any information that is not already present in an article. And because they have no new information, references and external links are not needed; the references should be in the articles that are linked to.

TP Music, TP Logistics, Tissue particle, and TP Explosives have no article and I couldn't find any other article that mentions them, so they don't belong on the disambiguation page.

There is no mention in Tom Petty that he is known as TP. If you feel that he is, add it to Tom Petty with reliable sources before adding it to the disambiguation page.

Finally, please add items only once unless they clearly belong in two categories; Tom Petty and TP records were added twice. Leschnei (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aniara (film) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Aniara (film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reference ^[5]Nakamuradavid (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aniara (film)

Hello, Nakamuradavid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aniara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice on Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Signaleer (talk) 22:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Aniara (film)

Hello, Nakamuradavid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Aniara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleiv

[2] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays'_Rebellion

[3] ttp://www.cbsnews.com/videos/an-education-about-the-electoral-college/

[4] ttps://www.imdb.com/title/tt7589524/

[5] ttps://www.imdb.com/title/tt7589524/

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]