User talk:Najamirah

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to The Akmak Complex, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. kongr43gpen ^Talk 15:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Akmak Complex with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:46, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Akmak Complex with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. kongr43gpen ^Talk 15:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at The Akmak Complex with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:55, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comment by Najamirah moved below, to relevant section A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Akmak Complex

Hi. As you can see, your blanking of this article has been causing some trouble. I see from one of your edit summaries that you believe the article is plagiarized. I wasn't able to find anything on google that matches the article text - could you please provide us with some information about where you believe the article was plagiarized from (or, if you are the original creator of the page, as you appear to be, where you copied the text from), and a link to the original content, if possible? Thank you. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't this be a case for {{db-author}}? The only other contribution to the page was extremely minor (removing a single word and reverting the blankings). Monty ₈₄₅ 16:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, you're right Monty. When I added this comment I hadn't noticed that he was the original author, then I backtracked thinking that if it were a copyvio it would still need special revdeling, but on a moment's thought, page deletion would handle that better than revdel would anyway. I tagged it for G7 and someone deleted it within seconds. I think we're good to go now. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some sentences in the article were lifted from this website http://www.mnsu.edu/emuseum/archaeology/sites/northamerica/akmak.html but this website no longer exists. Other sentences were lifted word for word from Akmak: An Early Archeological Assemblage from Onion Portage, Northwest Alaska by Douglas D. Anderson American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 74, No. 6 (Dec., 1972), pp. 1504-1505] and this source Akmak: An Early Archeological Assemblage from Onion Portage, Northwest Alaska by Douglas D. Anderson American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 74, No. 6 (Dec., 1972), pp. 1504-1505 and this source Reviewed work(s): Early Man in America American Anthropologist, New Series, Vol. 76, No. 4 (Oct., 1974), pp. 949-951]. This paper was posted unintentionally. I request that this article be immediately deleted.

Thanks for the information. We've taken care of this and the article has been deleted. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance.--Najamirah (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jay Douglas Franklin. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 11:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Lynne P. Sullivan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

joe•roe^t•c 09:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting McNutty

I'd say the university website pic is copyright, so not free for use. (Not expert, tho.) Contact the university; they can tell you if the photographer will release it (or has, by letting them post it). For uploading, you can use the "upload file" link, but I'd suggest you upload to Commons, instead, then just copy the filename. If there's anything else I can help with, message my talk. (Do reply there, k?) TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 20:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]