User talk:Naivepanda

Welcome!

Hello, Naivepanda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Business Property Relief, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Business Property Relief

A tag has been placed on Business Property Relief, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G12, mainly from [1]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:51, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 18:03, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An edit you wanted to make to Diabetes mellitus

I saw your edit[2] so I made an edit adding that type of information:[3]. As you can see, I didn't pick a name of an institution or highlight an individual study. Instead, I cited a review article for this information, as they are preferred per WP:MEDRS. This information should probably be covered in more detail at Diabetes management. Let me know if you have any questions. Biosthmors (talk) 16:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Heart failure

Hello again. I see you added some information about the UK telehealth initiative into heart failure.[4] But I don't see how it tells readers anything about how the heart failure is managed. Also, all your sources are primary, which isn't how we're really supposed to write articles here. An encyclopedia is a tertiary source, so we're based mainly off of secondary sources. Can you answer this question: What exactly is done differently from typical treatments when it comes to telehealth management of heart failure? If you have this type of information handy, it might be much more useful to readers. Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 16:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to have to temporarily remove all contributions of this kind, because I have concerns about the quality of the referencing. The evidence for any telehealth intervention is still limited, and we need strong secondary sources (see WP:MEDRS for guidance) to support such claims. JFW | T@lk 21:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a secondary source of the results from the trail

http://www.guardian.co.uk/healthcare-network/2011/dec/06/telehealth-significant-benefits-cut-deaths

February 2013

Hello, I'm Jojalozzo. I wanted to let you know that I undid parts of your recent contributions to Legal expenses insurance and Pre-paid legal service because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Joja lozzo 19:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jojalozzo. The edit was to update the page(s) to state that pre-paid legal services are now available in the UK. I suggest the edit stands without mention of the provider, to remove any promotional aspect. ie In January 2013, the first pre-paid legal service was launched in the UK. The policy covers members for legal costs associated with the following: divorce; property conveyancing; education appeals; contesting NHS care assessment claims; contested probate; personal injury claims; clinical negligence claims; pre-nuptials up to; and contract disputes. Are you satisfied with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naivepanda (talk • contribs)

We need a reliable secondary source (not a press release). Also, please remember that Wikipedia is not a daily newspaper that keeps everyone up to date on every new development. We can wait until this business proves itself worthy of mention. Joja lozzo 03:41, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telecare - Telephone Response Box.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Telecare - Telephone Response Box.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 01:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Telehealth - Blood Pressure Monitor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]