User talk:Naiseroder

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Arabization 123.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Arabization.jpg. The copy called Image:Arabization.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 11:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing to Arabization

You may not be aware of it, but there is a three revert rule on Wikipedia which means that you should not undo the actions of another editor more than three times in a 24-hour period. When the image you want to add to Arabization kept getting removed, the thing to do is to go to the user talk page of the editor who is removing it to discuss the issue with them and see if you can reach an agreement. Please don't keep changing back, because that just encourages the other editor to change to their version and makes a 'revert war'.

Revert warring is disruptive to the encyclopaedia and breaking the three revert rule can lead to being blocked from editing. Sam Blacketer 10:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arabization 123.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Arabization 123.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unencyclopedic image

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:Arabization 123.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Atari400 10:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arabization_123.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Arabization_123.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Atari400 20:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC) Atari400 20:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the images are what call unclear copyright and origin, however, I don't agree with the "reflects the user's very strong POV". I am talking about the fact of Abarization in Malaysia, it is fact, I did not invent it. What I want is to have a picture showing Abarization in Malaysia. Anyway I have local newspaper as source and many local Malaysian blogs to supportAbarization in Malaysia. Now since you point out the Image:Arabization_123.jpg is unclear copyright, I will have to look for original materials and I will upload a new one. Naiseroder 04:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]