User talk:Nahnite

Welcome!

Hello, Nahnite, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Repulsive Conception (album), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Repulsive Conception (album)

The article Repulsive Conception (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Album from a band whose notability is unclear.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Album articles

When you write an album article, please follow the manual of style per WP:ALBUM. A track listing should look like this:

"Name of Song" (Joe Anybody, Dave Anybody, Richard Someone, Michael Mysteryman) – 3:49
"Name of Next Song" (J. Anybody, Someone) – 4:39
"Name of Third Song" (Mysteryman) – 9:43
"Name of Fourth Song" (Roe, D. Anybody) – 9:34

and so on.

Use the full name of the writer the first time, and only the last name the second time, unless you need to use a first initial or full name to disambiguate. For instance, in the above example, I've used "D. Doe" for the second song written by Dave Anybody, since John Anybody also wrote one song. If they were John and Jeff Anybody, you'd have to use the full name both times since both names begin with J. Using the full name the first time makes it easier to create a link if the writer has an article, and it makes the article look more complete.

Also, please don't forget to categorize by artist and label (for instance, I just added Category:RCA Records albums and Category:Keith Whitley albums to L.A. to Miami). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 18:38, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Ducas (album)

Please don't forget to pipe your links. You had it linking to George Ducas instead of George Ducas (singer). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another Way to Go

May I ask why you addded the "(Radney Foster album)" to the end? There was nothing else called "Another Way to Go," so the "(Radney Foster album)" wasn't needed. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet Thursday album

See explanation at Talk:Sweet Thursday (album). Please go ahead and add to that start! Wasted Time R (talk) 03:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sweet Thursday (album)

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sweet Thursday (album), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for this one Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rose Colored Glasses (album)

I have nominated Rose Colored Glasses (album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Colored Glasses (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Feelgood

I've noticed that you've been making some edits to the Dr Feelgood article. They have been constructive and useful to the page, however, I would like to point you in the direction of WP:ALBUM. If you have a look at the Article Body section and tracklisting you will see how the Wikipedia guidelines show to lay out the tracklisting of an album. The reason I mention this is that you have been adding copyright information after every track, which does not meet the guidelines and can cause clutter on the page. You are more than welcome to continue editing the page, but you should look at removing the copyright information from each. If I have some spare time later I can have a look at it too. DrMotley (talk) 14:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee Plates

I see no reason to add publisher info for each song; that's kinda WP:IINFO. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dead Waters (album)

The article Dead Waters (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The album does not meet the criteria for album notability (namely, has not been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the artist or publisher of the album)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mycomp (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Devastation of Musculation

The article Devastation of Musculation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM, lacks any reliable coverage in independent sources. Discogs is not an acceptable source and the Allmusic entry is just a listing no professional reviews.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 11:07, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]