Jump to content

User talk:NahidShihab

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, NahidShihab, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! NahidShihab, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Jorekhali Senior Fazil Digree Madrasah moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Jorekhali Senior Fazil Digree Madrasah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Njd-de Assalamualaikum brother, I hope you are well. I have translated the Jorkhali Fazil Degree Madrasa page, and submit it for approval as per the rules, which you have moved to main, now let me know how to improve it. And I have tried to do as well as I can and most of them do not have access to the information. What can I do now? If it can be transferred to Main, do it. thank you. ~~~~ NahidShihab (talk) 08:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. The article lacks references to reliable sources that would demonstrate the school's notability. A 2021 discussion lead to a deletion of a similar article on that subject as it's not notable. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de Hi, I saw it, but it is in Bangla Wiki, and another one seems to be significant, because if it was not significant, it would not have been put in Bangla Wiki. How to see if it can be kept or not. Because it is in the wiki to do it from there. thank you~~~~ NahidShihab (talk) 09:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter if it exists on Bangla wiki or some other wiki. The English Wikipedia has it's own notability guidelines. If come to the realization that no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources exist, then I would recommend you to invest your valuable time on something else instead. Or is there a particular need to see an article for this madrash on enwiki? – NJD-DE (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de Brother , what i can i do ? this is my first edit , i am shocked , first artciles is not accepted which i translated from bn wiki NahidShihab (talk) 09:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article lacks references to reliable sources that would demonstrate the school's notability – NJD-DE (talk) 09:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de Yes, i saw it, but brother some of references  are showing this institute is existing NahidShihab (talk) 09:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Existence is not the same as notability. – NJD-DE (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de So, what i can do ? NahidShihab (talk) 09:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Find reliable sources that would demonstrate the school's notability – NJD-DE (talk) 09:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de ok, i try to find reliable sources and improve, thanks NahidShihab (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a particular reason why this school should have an article here? It seems to be your only topic of interest, so what's your connection to it ? – NJD-DE (talk) 10:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njd-de i have not any particular reason, this is my first translated from bn pages, as a first  article of my contribution  i should it would be add on en enwiki in main articles .Otherwise i cannot talk it for my new contribution.
Dear you already know when a contribution is rejected it should have a bad effect on our contribution.  
Thanks NahidShihab (talk) 12:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorekhali Senior Fazil Digree Madrasah (August 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Do not resubmit without addressing the concerns.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 10:31, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Greenman Hi, its already existing on bn wiki , i transalated from bn wiki NahidShihab (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Greenman i add 2 ref which is about the institute.review again. thANKS NahidShihab (talk) 19:44, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NahidShihab was:
Its already existing on bn wiki , i transalated it from bn wiki so why it not approved. NahidShihab (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NahidShihab (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This decline message was generated by you trying to manipulate the templates used by reviewers. I'm not going to try to fix it, but, with respect to your protest that the article already exists at bn-wiki, I'm afraid that carries no weight. A draft being considered for en-wiki must meet our project's criteria for inclusion, which may well be stricter than those applied at bn-wiki.
As mentioned on IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help, I looked at the references you were recently attempting to add to this draft. None of them are useful for establishing notability for the madrasah.
Some of the documents you were linking to were private copies of some reports uploaded to the Google Drive account of someone calling themselves Mr. Hacker. Even if the reports had value, we could never call them "published reliable sources" when linked this way. The other documents all seem to have been various sorts of bureaucratic permits or authorizations between educational institutions or the government. Documents such as these are treated as primary sources and - because they are either routine aspects of school life or based on what the schools say about themselves - cannot help with notability.
You might think that documents from a government or big university would be accorded special respect, but Wikipedia's community much prefers to see reporting in newspapers, magazines, or books to show notability, and disregards official and bureaucratic documents, at least as far as notability is concerned.
For an old school, more than 100 year old, we would expect that over the course of its existence it would have been written about from time to time by independent reporters. If you want this draft to become an article, you will need to find some of that reporting and use it to rebuild the draft, based on what those reporters have written. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmcgnh Thanks NahidShihab (talk) 19:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jorekhali Senior Fazil Digree Madrasah (August 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 05:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BuySomeApples hi, i find 2 news papper artciles which is about the institute then i add it my draft. can you review again and consider it for main articles. Thanks NahidShihab (talk) 19:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NahidShihab: nice job! I usually don't review the same page twice out of fairness, but you can resubmit it so another reviewer can look at it with fresh eyes. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BuySomeApples Thanks NahidShihab (talk) 06:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE UNBLOCK ME

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NahidShihab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

rhis my one account so why are you telling me i am a sock of farhan tanvir ? who is farhan , i see farhan is contribute jorekhali page this is the reson i am the conmtibute same pages areas i am not a sock of farhan tanvir. i would like to request plz unblcok me NahidShihab (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incoherent and does not address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Farhan Tanvir 628. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NahidShihab&oldid=1109167476"