User talk:Nagytibi

Welcome!

Hello, Nagytibi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! SqueakBox 00:12, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism

Szia! Bejelentettem itt. Adam78 23:20, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[[Budapest]is

Akkor jó; kösz, hogy visszaállítottad. Az interrogációdat az anonim editek revertjéről negligálnom kell: fogalmam sincs, és az angol help szisztéma oly komplikált, hogy koncepcióm sincs, hol kell megcsekkolni. Gubbubu 10:02, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good then, thanks for reverting. But I'm phobic I must negotiating your interrogation about reverting anonym edits, I have no idea, and because of the maximal complicatedness of english help system I have no conception about that where I could check it. Gubbubu 10:02, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User categorization

Hi! You can add yourself to the Category:Wikipedians in Hungary if you want to. :) Alensha 16:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfC against 86.105.71.34

Hi Tibi,

I'm putting together an RfC against anonymous user 86.105.71.34, who I think has engaged in several types of misconducts on Wikipedia, especially on Transylvania, Romania, Republic of Moldova, Romanian language. I'm writing to you because you attempted to solve one or more of those issues on the user's talk page. If you endorse this RfC, or have anything to add to the statement of dispute, please sign and share your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/86.105.71.34. Thanks, IulianU 00:05, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nagytibi, could you weigh in at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/86.105.71.34#How_to_proceed? -- Jmabel | Talk 18:44, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Municipiul in Hungarian

Szerbus Tibi! I'm currently working on a Romanian localities project for Wikipedia, both Romanian and English versions, and as you know, in Romania there is a law that states that all localities where an ethnic group makes up over 20% of the population, the language spoken by that group becomes a working language of local government. There are various localities in Romania that meet this requirement in regards to the Hungarian language. Due to this, the name on the infobox must be in both Romanian and Hungarian, as at Salonta or Oradea. So - I would like to know what the word for "Municipality" is in Hungarian. In Romania, Municipality is a status given to larger towns. The Romanian name is "municipiu". Currently, at the Salonta page there is "Municipiul Salonta" and just "Nagyszalonta". It needs to read "Municipality of Salonta" in Hungarian. Thanks, Ronline 07:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for following this up. So, from what I gather - is it OK just to list the Hungarian name of the city without "municípium"? In public administration here (correspondence from the City Hall) I have seen just "Nagyvarad" - that's why I asked! Ronline 06:39, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian wiki message

Thank you for the greeting at the Hungarian wiki. I probably will only use that account to add interwiki links, but I am thankful for the welcoming. In case you are unaware, Halibutt is going through the administrator vote process. I believe that any input you could provide would be valued. Olessi 07:53, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

iWiW

Then can you please put the link http://index.hu/tech/net/orkut0603/ on the article so it asserts its notability? Though the source is in Hungarian, it's okay. See WP:WEB for more info. Thanks. -- Perfecto 00:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

Azért írok neked, és még két-három magyar wikipédiásnak, mert szeretnék vmi szervezkedést elindítani a magyar történelemmel illetve a határon túli magyarsággal kapcsolatos oldalak ügyében. Úgy látszik, apró eredmények eléréséért is nagy harcokat kell vívni a szomszédainkkal, akik rendszerint sokkal jobban szervezettek, felkészültebbek és öntudatosabbak nálunk, így a történelmünket érintő cikkek vagy gyatra minőségűek vagy elfogultak vagy egyszerűen elhallgatják a nekünk kedvező tényeket. Kicsit fáradt vagyok már az állandó magányos csatározástól (bár a legérzékenyebb témákat eddig elkerültem) és jól jönne néha a segítség. A wikipedia azon az elven működik, hogy a sok-sok szerző egymást állandóan javítva, korrigálva, egymással vitatkozva jobbítja a cikkeket. Úgy tűnik, mi túl kevesen vagyunk ahhoz, hogy ez természetes módon, tudatos szervezkedés nélkül működjön. Ha van vmi ötleted vagy csak néha benéznél egy-egy felforrósodó topikba, előre is köszi! Üdv. Zello 03:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request

Hey Tibi,

I need a bit of help from a native speaker of Hungarian. We are putting together a portal page for the Romanian Wikimedia local chapter at http://www.wikimedia.ro , and would like to have the text in as many languages spoken in Romania as possible. Could you translate the following bit of text into Hungarian, please?

Imagine a world in which every single person is given free access 
to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. 
And we need your help.

Wikipedia in Hungarian

(it's actually Wikimedia Foundation's slogan. Well, we'll work out something more substantive later :-) )

Thanks! Iulian U. 14:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Timea Vaginavoelgyi

[1]

thanx for cleaning up hungarian-related articles.

♥♥♥Gubb ✍

22:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Deleted edits

Thank you. Could you also tell me how I can know the article that was deleted after being edited by me?Loom91 13:45, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian help needed

Hello Nagytibi, I'm contacting you because we need some Hungarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hu.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Hungarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 01:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nagytibi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nagytibi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nagytibi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]