User talk:Nagsamm4

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Nagsamm4, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 18:37, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 11:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Kapu (caste)

When your edits are reverted, please don't simply reinstate them, Nagsamm4, as you did here. That is the time to go to the talkpage to discuss, and to explain why you made the edit. (Sitush asked you about that here.) Bishonen | talk 23:05, 13 March 2018 (UTC).[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Rajesh rao kumar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 02:25, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nagsamm4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20902 was submitted on Mar 18, 2018 05:51:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:51, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Unblock me. And i will use Talk page to put my words before u. And hope it will help in improving the page And in Kapu caste, I just changed the word meaning. Now onwards, i will provide sources too Nag Sam 07:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nagsamm4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I want to contribute more to the wikipedia pages. But i m not here to say something which is false. I m not here to boast of any caste. Kapu caste name is derived from Telugu word Kapadu which means to protect and farmer is known as Ryotu in Telugu. There has been some misconception and i felt it wrong. The only thing i did was reverting the changes instead of going to talk page. from now onwards, i understand the rules of wikipedia and i will abide to it by providing reliable sources i want to get unblocked.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Madivada

The article Madivada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability exists for this topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 15:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]