User talk:NagarjunaSarma

Hello, NagarjunaSarma, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 20:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please do not cite books without page numbers / quotes, as you did here: the book does not support the statement you claim it does. utcursch | talk 01:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:RS - random docs hosted on scribd and personal websites are not acceptable sources for Wikipedia articles. utcursch | talk 02:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kamma (caste). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Raju shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 22:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kamma (caste) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 22:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Sharkslayer87 (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]