User talk:Nadusally

May 2022

Hello, I'm M.Bitton. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kerala Police, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 19:14, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you recently removed content from World Students' Day without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 18:10, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nadusally! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:22, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University, you may be blocked from editing. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. TheoCourt (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jackfruit. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date is 2015

Actual date is 2015 Nadusally (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nadusally! That may be true, but we need you to cite a source for that so our readers can verify the information. Please don't change articles, even if you know they are wrong, without providing a reliable source. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com/search?q=dr+apj+abdul+kalam+university+established+year&oq=Dr+&aqs=chrome.3.69i59j46i39i175i199j69i59l2j69i60j69i57j46i67i131i433j46i67.2017j0j4&client=ms-android-vivo&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadusally (talk • contribs) 19:38, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Nadusally. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and neither is Google, which largely takes its information for this kind of thing from Wikipedia. We need a reliable source, which would either be published by the Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University itself or by some independent publisher with a reputation for fact checking and editorial control.

You also have been edit warring on Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University. This is not acceptable, and may lead to you being blocked from editing. Please be so kind to undo your last revert. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 19:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nadusally reported by User:Apaugasma (Result: ). Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 20:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nadusally. You are risking a block per the edit warring complaint. There may still be time for you to avoid sanctions if you respond there and promise to wait for consensus before changing the article again. EdJohnston (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam University

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nadusally. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:59, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This Ip address is not related to my account Nadusally (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lot of persons are editing and public wifi Nadusally (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Pinarayi Vijayan, you may be blocked from editing. A lot of reliable sources were cited, so it's probably not fake. Rhinocesus (talk) 11:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This information were not truth Nadusally (talk) 11:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Pinarayi Vijayan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 19:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All Links are incorrect information poor source need clarification Nadusally (talk) 04:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas J. Fenn

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas J. Fenn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/basketball-doyen-thomas-fenn-passes-away/articleshow/77970612.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 21:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]